Penguins Take One in Pitt, Beat Detroit 3-2
Now that was hockey. Fast-paced, hard-hitting, in your face hockey that can make even the occasional fan sacrifice a small animal on the alter of the Hockey Gods. Hopefully this display of athleticism was enough for NBC - and hopefully it will continue in Game 4.
A close shot of the Adam Hall game-winning goal
Sure, if you erase the first two games and act like they never happened, Pitt would be up 1-0 right now. But that's not the case and it's something the Penguins and us fans have to just accept and move on from. But if the Pens play the rest of this series like they did tonight, then the hockey world better prepare for one of the best series in years.
I'd like to also say a special thanks to our friends at Mile High Hockey for joining Pensburgh for the in-game open thread. I'll always have room for company on this site and you're all always welcome.
Now onto the game...
Guess what? Chris Osgood is human. The Pens charged ahead with an unprecedented assault in Game 3. Of course, when you consider their lack of such in the first two games, anything over 15 shots would be a relief. 24 shots on Osgood, 21 stopped. And who would've guessed the game-winner would come from one of the finest role-players on the Pens? He's not a big guy, or a man of finesse, but Adam Hall was just in the right place at the right time to tag the game-winner off Osgood's heel.
Bounces. The Pens got the bounces. The very thing that went against them earlier in the series worked to their advantage on Pittsburgh ice.
Just to get an idea of what kind of action this game possessed, there was nearly six straight minutes of hockey in the third period without a single whistle. Fast line changes, shorter shifts and even the veteran presence of Daryl Sydor worked to the team's advantage. Although Sydor got rocked out pretty good on the boards a few times, his flawless presence on the ice was in high regard. You'd never know the guy has been out for nearly two months. Props to Therrien for the move.
Between the pipes MAF was solid; not perfect, but solid. One save in particular (searching desperately for video) amazingly stayed out of the net. I wish I could describe it, but just the mental replay of said play causes angels to sing in harmony. The Wings out-worked Fleury (32-34) throughout the entire game. To say he wasn't the reason the Penguins won would be a lie. To say he nearly gave fans a heart attack in doing so couldn't come closer to the truth.
Johan Franzen showed us all why his nickname is The Mule when he charged through four Pittsburgh defenseman to tag the first red light for the Wings. The only other Detroit goal came on a easy-stop wrister that somehow managed to skimp out of Fleury's sights.
The penalties were few (definitely in comparison to Game 2) but they couldn't have come at worse times. Worst of all was the Malkin hooking call late in the third that could have tied the game for Detroit had they converted with the man advantage.
That about does it for Game 3. Everything the Pens did wrong in the previous games they did right on Thursday, minus the whole shutting out Detroit thing (more of a hope than a requirement).
If in the slight chance this game just wasn't enough bashing of Detroit for you, if you turned to ESPN you'd have witnessed the Celtics just barely beating the Pistons 106-102 in Game 5 of the series.
And now we wait till Saturday for Game 4 in Pitt.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sorry I didn’t make it in time to be a part of the game thread, but I’m generally too far on the edge of my seat to post during a game anyway. Much thanks for the shout out though.
A couple of thoughts.
MAF: I thought he played great. He bounced back after what I considered a lack-luster performance in Game 2. Is the save you are talking about the one where he laid out and hit the puck with his stick? If so, I’m not sure if he actually got a piece of that one, I think it was off the post. Though, it did look like he would have stopped it if it was inside the post.
Sydor: I generally like Letang, but Sydor stepped up and added the veteran presence we needed. Nice move by Michel Terrien.
Most importantly the Pens played Pens hockey like we wanted them too. It was fast paced, hard hitting, and lacking a plethora of penalty minutes. Hopefully the Pens can win game 4 and even up the series. Like you said Frank, the Pens can still win in six.
It’s all good. The game holds precedence and I understand completely.
MAF did play well. But as evidenced by that light wrister he let in, you can’t even allow Detroit to come that close. One they got the smell of blood and pulled within one, they were on fire and the Pens’ D had to crank it up to the highest degree of the season just to rock them out. I have no idea how that shot stayed out – post, stick hit – who knows? And we never saw a replay on it because that was right in the heart of the non-stop play for over 6 minutes.
I don’t expect Therrien to touch the lines for Game 4. He’s devised a system that works and, like any coach, he doesn’t want to mess with it.
Also, don’t forget the play of Brooks Orpik. That guy was annihilating people in the closing minutes of the game. Talk about an insurance guy.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
FYI, you can see the highlight of the save on NHL.com’s game highlights. You have to go to the Penguins game channel, then game highlights, and then saves. It’s Fleury’s save on Datsyuk, P. @ (08:16 in 3rd)]
http://penguins.nhl.tv/team/launch.htm?hlp=8470594&event=PIT1005“
There is a way to embed it, apparently. But I’m not sure how to do that. Frank, see if you can figure it out. (the embed info is below the video where it says “share”)
I’m looking into it JD. Apparently there is something I don’t know about 2.0 as far as embedding video in comments. I used to do it all the time in the last version, but once I hear back from the admins I toss it up. Keep in mind, you can always embed it as a fanshot on the side of the screen and link to it from the comments. Just click video as an option and paste the embed code. Give it a shot if you have a chance. I don’t want to hog the fanshots section.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Hmm. I’m not sure what is up with it. I keep getting this error:
There were problems saving this FanShot
Html can’t be blank
It might be something with the embed link I’m getting off of the NHL.com Highlight.
nah it’s not the code. It’s definitely something with the site. I tried posting a vid during intermission last night in the open thread and it posted as a blank post. I’ll get it figured out soon.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Well I was able to preview the video on my personal google site as a way to check it. But when I went to actually publish the video to the site, it said:
“Your HTML either contains unsafe tags (iframe, embed, styles, script) or extra attributes. They will be removed when the page is viewed.”So my assumption is that this site does the same thing, but doesn’t give you a warning. Which might mean that the NHL.com embed link is somewhat sketchy.
Either way, I look forward to figuring it out. It’s been driving me nuts.
P.S.: It’s really hard to see if he actually saved the shot here, but apparently they gave him credit for a save considering it’s on the highlights. Either that or it was just highlight worthy for looking cool, I’m not sure how they determine what is a save highlight.
I do remember seeing one replay of the save after the whistle finally blew. I had it recorded on the DVR in front of a big HDTV, so I was able to replay it a coulpe times and get a good look. To me it looked like it hit off the outside of the post, but Fleury’s stick was at the same height as the puck and he probably would have stopped it (or atleast gotten a piece of it) had it been on the inside of the post.
I was screaming so loud I hardly knew what happened. I’ve trying to find a youtube of it so I could post it up, but the best I could do was get the Brooks Orpik killing spree posted. Check it out in fanshots.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
I’m a bit hoarse from my yelling yesterday, but it was well worth the effort, I say.
I have to mention – it was a lot easier and much more enjoyable to follow the open thread with the new system. It was my first participation since the switch and I have to say that I like it a whole lot.
Will blog for food.
No Kidding
it was a lot easier and much more enjoyable to follow the open thread with the new system
The autoupdating comments is the best thing since sliced bread. Trying to follow a game thread when you have to keep hitting refresh is just plain obnoxious.
I agree. after running this site on both platforms I have to say the newest one is by far the easiest. Rumor has it 3.0 possesses the ability to read your mind and spare you from typing it yourself.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Well if it was on your site and you DIDN’T type it, then maybe you’re the beta tester for 3.0 and don’t even know it. But if you think it, we’ll know.
(throws up from confusion)
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
well at least the Tigers got out of last place
Tough night to be a Detroit sports fan yesterday, what with the Wings going down, and then switching over to see the Pistons claw back from 17 down to cut it to one, before falling. But the Tigers won, and now the Royals are back in their customary last place hole. Gotta hold on to something….
Oh yeah, watched the replay of the Hall goal…couldn’t help noticing the Penguins skater get his foot tangled up with Osgood as he was on the side of the net….probably more of an interference than either of Game 2’s penalties. Not taking away from the goal, that sequence should be up among the best highlights of the year….
One more thing, based on a parapharse of something said about Detroit’s goal in the first couple of games, can’t remembere if I saw it here or not….but basically, the person was going on about how all of Detroit’s scores were garbage goal, not skillful.
Don’t agree with that at all, especially what with Samuelsson opening goal of the series, where he outskated the Pens D and scored on a wraparound, but to each his own opinion. That said, I hope they’d agree that both of Crosby’s tallies last night fits under the same category. Both were scored from being in the right place at the right time, rather than from any display of his prodigious skills.
Both Franzen’s and Hall’s goals were things of beauty….
Don’t know if you read anything about Detroit’s goals being garbage on this site. Perhaps in reference to last night’s game, you misread this:
The only other Detroit goal came on a easy-stop wrister that somehow managed to skimp out of Fleury’s sights.
I mean, that was just a recap of the scoring last night; no reference to previous games. But what I did emphasize in the previous recaps were bounces. Detroit got them on home ice and Pitt is getting them on their home turf as well.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
now that I think about it
I think it was in the comments section one the on-line versions of one of your newspaper.
It was just a comment that rankled, because it was just dumb. Didn’t mean to impugn anyone around here….
Besides, I thought Detroit’s second goal defelected in off the Pittsburgh’s D-man’s stick, so I’m certainly not claiming it to be anything special.
The thing about Hall’s goal, for me….well, last night I compared it to a few goals Brendan Shanahan scored for the Wings over his years in Detroit, and I always loved those, where he’d be behind the goal line, no angle whatsoever, but he’d shoot at an exposed part of the goalie and bank it in. Deliberate shots that most people wouldn’t take, because of low percentage that they’d actually go in. I thought Hall’s goal was similar, he saw Osgood moving, and took a chance, and it paid off. Smart move, good aim, thing of beauty in my book, even if it was for the other team….
No prob – sometimes those kind of comments just linger; I understand completely.
Hall’s goal wasn’t beautiful by any means; aside from the obvious beauty of being the game-winner. With Detroit keeping the Pens blanked in two straight games, any shot is a shot regardless of percentage. I think that was something addressed by Michel Therrien in the locker room at some point during the night. “Don’t make it look pretty, just hit the net.” Here’s to hoping Pitt can keep that up in Game 4. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say Detroit’s D won’t let them walk so easily this time around.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Recently joined
I just recently joined the blog. I have mainly been involved in the Steelers blog up to this point, but I wanted to join in here, too.
I have to say I’m very glad that the Penguins stepped it up last night and finally got a goal, and a win. I hope that maybe they were a little overwhelmed the first two games, or else had a letdown from thrashing the Flyers in the last game, and they are back to playing great like they had all playoffs.
I read through the game thread, and I have say, FrankD, you and some of the other commenters have great senses of humor. A couple of comments had me laughing pretty hard. :)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on May 29, 2008 3:35 PM EDT reply actions
Welcome aboard Wolfpack, glad to have you here. The Pens definitely showed they’re not ready to cash it in just yet. I still think there’s no better crowd in hockey than the one in Pittsburgh (minus Montreal/Toronto).
I aim to keep the site light-hearted and funny but also informative and reputable. Just looking to have a good time and keep the facts straight. Glad you got a laugh out of it – mission complete.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Thanks
Glad to be here. I have to admit, I waited until the SB Nation upgrade to join the site. Sheer laziness, I know, but, hey… I see everyone’s loving the new format as much all of us over Behind the Steel Curtain.
Yeah, I have added Pensburgh to my usual rotation of sites to check now. I have definitely enjoyed reading your coverage of the team through the playoffs (made obviously more enjoyable by the fact that they won so much). Thanks, again, and keep up the great work!
by WolfpackSteelersFan on May 29, 2008 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Danke mang. I’ll even admit it – I’ve been on the network since late December (although the blog existed on blogspot for months beforehand), but I hardly ever made a new name on other sites because of the laziness and hassle factor. They made it so much easier in 2.0.
Glad to have you reading. Keep with us in the offseason too. I already have some good reader-oriented stuff lined up for the downtime.
No rushing it though – we have a cup to win first.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Yeah, I’ve joined 5 or 6 new sites since BTSC upgraded. It’s so cool that you just have to click a button and say ok. :)
Agreed, no rush. Don’t want the offseason until at least game six.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on May 29, 2008 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
many a time since discovering sbnation I’ve wanted to just make one or two comments on a given enemy blog, and it was always the fact that you had to sign up for each separately that kept me from doing so. This interactivity is a brilliant feature…
interactivity
Definitely – and it lets you get a sense of what fans from what teams are with you. I love having some of the MHH crew on the game threads.
Will blog for food.
Glad you like the humor – apparently some people didn’t think so highly of it. We mean no harm, honest!
Welcome aboard!
Will blog for food.
Bah – but all the right ones did. Come to think of it, the only people who complained were Wings fans. It’s not their blog (although welcomed), so complaints don’t go so far.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Yeah, if you’re venturing into enemy territory, you need have thick skin, eh? :)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on May 30, 2008 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions

by 



















