Pens of the Past - Mark Recchi
I'll admit, this is an interest Penguin of the past because technically his career is not "in the past." But after his treatment back in November 2007, it's safe to say Mark Recchi will never return to Steel Town.
The Pittsburgh Penguins and Mark Recchi is a story of ups and downs, followed by an all new set of ups and new downs and finally settled with a controversial nail in the proverbial coffin that is Mark Recchi's career. Today in the latest installment of Pens of the Past, we'll look back on the good years of Mark Recchi's tenure and end it on a more somber note.

You can't be a Penguins fan, hear someone mention the name of Mark Recchi and not bite your tongue. There's both good things and bad that can be said of Recchi, even more so when you consider his constant comings and goings around the team.
Let's start at the beginning.
In 1988 Recchi made his debut with the Pittsburgh Penguins but was far from playing at the level in which the team needed him, scoring only 1G and 1A in 15 games. After a return to the IHL Muskegon Lumberjacks for the remainder of the season, Recchi came back stronger than ever and vied for a more permanent presence in Pittsburgh in 1989. This would officially mark the beginning of Recchi's NHL career.
Recchi was on board just in time for the Penguins first Cup win in 1991, but shipped out 58 games into what would ultimately turn into a second-straight championship for Pittsburgh. Recchi landed in Philly to play alongside the likes of one Eric Lindros and Mikael Renberg.
Oddly enough, after a trade that sent Recchi to Montreal in 1994. Recchi went back to Philly for a second stint in 1998. Yet his numbers hardly matched up to Recchi's career-high 123 point season in 1992. By 2005, in the post-lockout NHL, Recchi returned to Pittsburgh.
As many Penguins fans know, these were not the bright days of the franchise. John LeClair, Mark Recchi and Mario Lemieux made for the core of experience with an otherwise young Pittsburgh franchise. In efforts to cash in the season, perhaps even free up some cap space and make a run for the #1 pick in the draft, Pittsburgh shipped the Recchin Ball out to Carolina with less than 20 games remaining in the season. As luck would have it, Recchi landed yet another championship with the Carolina Hurricanes.
But there was still some love for Pittsburgh, and in 2006 Recchi came back to the team for a full 82-game season. His 24-44, 68 point performance was hardly worthy of acclaim. However on January 26, 2007, Recchi notched his 500th goal in the black and gold. Some would say his career came full circle.
But this was hardly the end for Recchi's career, but 19 games into the 2007 season would say otherwise for his tenure in Pittsburgh. Released from the team in late October, Recchi was faced with one of the more insulting treatments of any veterans. Unclaimed off waivers, it seemed as if Recchi was going to spend some time with the WBS Penguins as part of what may have been a permanent rehabilitation stint. Before he could even suit up for the minors, Recchi was claimed off waivers by the Atlanta Thrashers.
Two weeks later, Recchi sought vengeance on his former team with the game-winning goal in a shootout.

Talk about payback...
As the upcoming 2008-2009 season slowly approaches its start, the Penguins can expect to go up against the likes of Mark Recchi once again. This season, alongside fellow former Penguins Gary Roberts, Adam Hall, Ryan Malone and Mike Ouellet, Recchi and the Tampa Bay Lightning face off against the Penguins for the first time on December 23. For those who don't think Recchi will play with a chip on his shoulder, just reference the picture above...
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How many days until hockey starts again? Not that your blog posts aren’t riveting Frank, but I’m ready from some friggin hockey. Think we can get a countdown going somewhere on the site?
I might be able to muster up a lil something. Do you want it to countdown to preseason or the season opener in Sweden?
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Ask and ye shall receive. Give me a day or two and I’ll have a spiffy countdown on the site for y’all.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
I have to say that I still have a soft spot for the Recchin Ball. I hate that it went so sour last season, but I did enjoy the good times with him. 500 was pretty exciting.
I'm sorry, Mr. Hossa, but I'm afraid we can't be friends anymore. Why? Because I hate you.
I think they definitely mishandled the situation this past season, especially when he was a day or two away from suiting up with the WBS Pens. He almost did an Alexander Mogilny, whereby his entire career would just expire in the minors.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
I may be wrong, but wasn’t Recchi traded to Montreal for Lindros? He ended up playing with Lindros after returning to Philly, but I could have sworn I heard that he was part of the trade to bring Lindros to Philly as a rookie or maybe 2nd year player.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 12, 2008 4:11 PM EDT reply actions
Hmmm not that I know of. Recchi was traded midseason from Pitt to Philly in 1991-92, the year Lindros was drafted. So I don’t think it had anything to do with the trade. But I know Lindros was drafted by Quebec and refused to play for the Nordiques, so they traded him away to Philly for Forsberg. That relationship eventually went full circle, as we all know Forsberg landed back in Philly during the 2006/2007 trade deadline.
Here’s something interesting I read on Lindros’ wikipedia:
Lindros was supposed to go to the New York Rangers for Doug Weight, Tony Amonte, Alexei Kovalev, John Vanbiesbrouck and three first round draft picks (1993, 1994 & 1995) and $12 million. It was overruled by an arbitrator.
Can you imagine giving up all that for Lindros? Granted, at the time he was expected to really light up the record books, but in the end the only thing that got lit up was him…
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Must have got Recchi and Forsberg mixed up then. Oh, well. It was several years ago when I heard this.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 12, 2008 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s all good. Did you by any chance join the BehindTheSteelCurtain fantasy football? If so, look out… ;-)
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Yes, I did. And, I saw that you were in it as well. :) That’s cool, I get to compete against my two favorite Pittsburgh bloggers. :) No offense to the guy at Bucs Dugout, I just can’t get into baseball.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 13, 2008 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s alright. It’s kinda hard to be Pirates fan when they give away the only players that perform well. i.e. Nady, Bay
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Yeah, I still remember hating them for trading Neagle to the Braves (the team that brought about their demise).
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 13, 2008 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Personally I think the Pirates brought about their own demise.
And be careful mentioning the Braves around here…JDMaker is a Braves fan.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
True, the Pirates did basically sell off the team back then. Oh well.
I knew JDMaker was a Braves fan, so I tried to be respectful of that. I didn’t think that my comment would offend him, but if so, let me know.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 14, 2008 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Oh, well, then! :)
I still won’t make a big deal about it, but I may mention every so often how I’m enjoying their last three seasons. ;)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 14, 2008 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
hah – or that horrendous display of baseball in the Chicago double header yesterday. I only care because I have two Atlanta players (McCann and Kotchman) on a fantasy baseball team.
FrankD from Pensburgh.com
Yes, after all the years of just knowing that the Braves would pull out all those 1-0 or 2-1 games, it’s kind of nice to see their pitching so bad these days.
I wouldn’t even care, but my sister-in-law absolutely must see every Braves game that’s on when the family gets together. That’s been going on about every weekend for the last 3-4 years. Anyway, enough about baseball on a hockey blog.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 14, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions

by 


















