Tracking the toughest players in the NHL: The Black and Blue Trophy
Long-time readers might remember a metric we took a look at last season, the Black and Blue Trophy. It is a simple measure of which players are blocking shots and the opposition. It's tough, yeoman's work. Often times those throwing their body in front of rubber and into others end up on the shelf, an unfortunate reminder that shows the Black and Blue guys have to be durable to make it on this list.
This year's official Black and Blue trophy has a new twist: defensemen are now the only players eligible. In years past we've included forwards, but they don't block enough shots to be considered in the true spirit of what the award is trying to encompass. This isn't about the guys who forecheck hard (like Cal Clutterbuck and Dustin Brown) but someone that embodies the sacrifice of a black and blue player.
In this day and age there are a lot of great stats out there, like Behind the Net which does awesome work and has a vast database of in depth statistics. Here's a great resource that James Mirtle recently wrote to overview these new-age stats and metrics that are popping up more and more to judge how good players are beyond just goals and assists.
Behind the jump, your tough-nosed leaderboard.
A little more sophisticated look at defensive defensemen is Mirtle's list, which uses a secretive formula to rank players based off the quality of competition they play and the goals allowed by their team while they're on the ice. Brent Seabrook, Andy Sutton and Greg Zanon make both Mirtle's "best defensive defensemen" and the black and blue.
From last February's BnB list: Orpik, Greene, Robidas and Seabrook are on there, showing great durability. Most of those guys are towards the top of the lists and both years.
As always, this isn't a list without it's limitations (hits subjective from town to town, etc, etc) but it serves a purpose to recognize guys who may not be putting up goals/assists but are still specialized defenders.
Here's the rest of the list for the Penguins:
Among BnB/games played, Orpik is still the king (other than Guenin's very short sample size). What jumps out to me is Engelland, who did well to ring up a lot of hits in his brief time in the NHL.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Engelland is the heir apparent to McKee, since there is little chance McKee takes a discount of the same magnitude to stay. How about Guenin averaging 5 hits a game? This is too small a sample size to be accurate, but it bodes well for his chances of sticking in the future.
What jumps out to me is that Eaton and McKee both are averaging less than 1 hit per game. Sure they block shots, but you gotta make guys pay for going in front of the net or trying to stay in the corners.
Eaton especially isn’t very physical, but he is very effective. Could he be better in his own one if he threw more checks? Probably, but that’s outside of his game and leaving the comfort zone could be bad.
Guys like Eaton make it to the NHL because they know their limitations and they maximize and focus on doing things they do well. He doesn’t need 3-4 hits a night to play well.
You come at the king, you best not miss.
Great stuff
Just like last year, Anton Volchenkov isn’t as high on the list as he should be because of injury (I’m guessing that’s why he’s not in the top 12). Guy has 51 hits and 50 blocked shots in 19 games.
Really impressed to see Bogosian up there at such a young age. Wow.
Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
Looks to me like Engelland just went crazy for nine games. And if I’m not mistaken, in two of those nine he spent at least 5 minutes in the box for fighting too. Way to make the most of your ice time.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
The issue I have w/ using hits as part of statistical analysis is that there are elite defensive players in the NHL who hardly hit at all. Lidstrom, for one.
That’s why I lean heavily on goals against and strength of competition in my analysis. Your list is of “tough” defencemen, but not necessarily the best ones.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
Absolutely James. Yours paints a good picture of the complete defensive defenseman. Mine just shows a small snapshot of the tougher, durable guys.
It’s definitely possible to be a better all-around defensive defenseman without hitting everything in sight, like a positionally strong guy like Lidstrom.
You come at the king, you best not miss.






















