AHL Playoff Update: Baby Pens blow Game 3, but still have series lead 2-1
We're very wrapped up around here with the NHL playoffs, but there's another playoff seres for the Penguins organization going on right now. In the blink of an eye, the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins have played three games in the past three games days against the Bridgeport Sound Tigers.
Game 1 Recap (Friday): Chris Minard and Dustin Jeffrey scored to give the Pens a 2-0 lead. Luca Caputi put another on the board to make it 3-0. The Sound Tigers rallied back to make it 3-2 but John Curry held strong and Wilkes-Barre took a 1-0 series lead. Unfortunately though, Janne Pesonen would leave this game with an apparant hand/wrist injury and has been out of the playoffs ever since with not much in the way of details for his return.
Game 2 Recap (Saturday): This game was in Bridgeport, thanks to some scheduling quirks with the Sound Tigers. Back in their own barn, they came out the gates strong and took a 4-2 lead into the third period. But defenseman Andy Wozniewski with 6 minutes left in the game to make it 4-3. Ben Lovejoy then tied it on a great rush up the ice to force over-time. Four minutes into OT, Minard scored the game winner to give the Baby Pens a 2-0 series lead.
Game 3 Recap (Sunday): The game would be back in Wilkes-Barre but Tim Wallace wouldn't be available, as he was suspended a game for a hit to the head. Still, WB/S roared out the gates taking a 4-1 lead in the game on the strength of Jean-Michel Daoust's two goals and two assists. Undeterred, Bridgeport rallied back to score three goals in regulation and then take the game in OT.
It's seemed like a real back and forth battle, which shouldn't be a surprise since Bridgeport (49-23-3-5) and Wilkes-Barre (49-25-3-3) had almost identical regular season records and are no strangers to one another. In the best of seven battle, expect this one to keep going right down to the wire until one of the teams emerge to move on.
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
assuming you meant three games in three days, it highlights a thought that’s been kicking around my skull for a few days: why, other than for unobstructed calendar/television purposes, do the NBA playoffs, which begin at the same time as the NHL playoffs, take 3-4 weeks longer than the hockey playoffs to run?
Sure, they have fewer players, and each athlete is on the floor for longer, but I don’t think basketball is physically a tougher sport to play than hockey.
Is this a case where there’s not enough fans involved with hockey to make it worth the networks’ time to space it out so more games can be seen by a wider audience?
by ahtrap on Apr 20, 2009 4:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was actually just arguing that point with a friend last night. Now that I can actually catch the Nuggets on TV (I enjoy basketball but can’t bring myself to pay for the NBA Pass) I was a bit surprised to see they played last night and then had an off schedule until Wednesday. It must be all the nonstop contact, hits into the boards and scuffed up knuckles getting the best of them this time of year.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com
by FrankD on Apr 20, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the catch, ahtrap.
Yeah, I don’t know why the NBA playoffs are more spread-out. I think everyone would agree that hockey is more physically demanding, but it would probably suck to run 35-40 minutes a night like the basketball players have to every other night for two months, probably why they have a little more time in between for recovery.
Television though probably factors in, as it always does with the big money that networks pay for coverage.
by Hooks Orpik on Apr 20, 2009 4:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
















