Strength in numbers by the numbers
So far this series we've seen a combined total of 63 penalties called - roughly 16 per game. The margin between teams isn't all that wide either. Philly has been called for more penalties (34) than Pitt (29) for a difference of only four, while the power play chances remain just slightly in favor of the Penguins (25 to Philly's 22). Consider the number of times a Pen has followed a Flyer to the box seconds after going on the PP and it's almost like that power play didn't exist anyway.
Up until last night's game both teams managed to score at least one goal with the man advantage.
| PIT | PHI | |
| Game 1 | 1-8 | 1-4 |
| Game 2 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Game 3 | 1-7 | 1-6 |
| Game 4 | 0-5 | 0-8 |
Pitt is basically converting at a rate of one goal per six chances while Philly is just slightly off at one for every seven. In the PP rankings of playoff teams the Pens come in at sixth (16%) and the Flyers eighth (13.6%). On the PK they rank ninth and eleventh, respectively.
Given the obvious offensive threats on both teams, are you at all flattered by these numbers? Last night sure left a lot of "maybe this time" comments flowing through both threads.
Heading into the series I didn't expect to see a ton of goals on the PP, although admittedly felt Philly may have had the upper hand in that category (come on, we've all seen Pitt on the PP this year). Maybe credit has to go toward both teams' PK units for turning this into more of a 5-on-5 series, or in some cases 4-on-4.
You also can't forget the big penalty killers as well - Marc-Andre Fleury and Marty Biron. Last night both goalies shut the door on the PK and looked just about as solid as you'd hope, or in Biron's case dread, them to be.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have to say that I’m surprised the Penguins power play is doing as well as it is. With that being said, I’m not surprised that the Penguins didn’t score any power play goals last night. The Flyers scored more shorthanded goals than anyone else in the regular season, and after game three’s shorthanded goal the Penguins had to respect that.
P.S.: 34 minus 29 is 5.
A lot of the PPs have been very short-lived, with calls going against the man-up team very early in their PP. There have been some interesting 4-on-4 scenarios, and I’ve actually been pretty surprised at how well Philly has neutralized the Pens’ speed and skill in most 4-on-4s. They have the potential to be a very dangerous team with that much extra ice to work with. Credit to the Flyers.
That, and as you alluded to, my dog blindfolded might find an empty hockey net more often then the pens PP scores. I can’t understand how they can go from controlling the puck in their Off. zone so well even-strength to what looks sometimes like a Junior High School PP.
-David, www.piratesmix.com.
by pascaldupweevil on Apr 22, 2009 6:08 PM EDT reply actions
Philly has also shown a lot of finesse on the PK. That shorty in Game 3 confirms that. Outside of that goal they’ve continued to put on pressure, at times making the Pens out to look like the team that is a man down.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
The Pens miss on a lot of passes, at least at the end of the year and into the playoffs. The passes just aren’t the most accurate and they often aren’t received well.
Watch on the PP, often the play loses a second in passing, we take too long getting control of the puck which slows down the PP puck movement.
Watch our PP and Detroit, they pass so well their PP puck flies around the rink and the PK is often a step behind. That’s not the case with the Pens.
5 on 5 doesn’t rely on so many passes to create openings and we take a lot of gamble passes that turn into goals when they work. Individual skating talent is less a factor on the PP and more a factor in 5 on 5. At least this is my theory on the problem.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 22, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
























