Thoughts from being at Game 1
Interesting times in DC. Wear a blue Penguins jersey there and the fans will call you (as they walk by, never to your face) a word that starts with Q and a rhymes with "fear". Whatevs. At this point all that needs to have been said about the game pretty much has been said in the past 24 hours, but here's what I thought from being there:
- It seemed like the Penguins were trying to matchup Hal Gill and Rob Scuderi against Alex Ovechkin. They were fine when Brooks Orpik and Sergei Gonchar were out there, but often they would short-change to get #2 and #4 out there.
- Every fan seems to think they are a power-play coach...Or at least a power-play guru, so we all have opinions of what is going wrong and what they need to do. My sense is that once the Pens get setup, too many players are stationary. It doesn't seem like anyone is moving unless they have the puck. So it's allowing opponents to clog the passing/shooting lanes that are not shifting around. Regardless of what is wrong, they need to get some more pressure and goals to have a chance of winning.
- Simeon Varlamov did make a heck of a save, but he also gave up a weak goal to Mark Eaton. I think if the Pens keep peppering him with shots, he's going to start cracking a little more and more.
- Brooks Orpik was on the ice for both of the even-strength goals against. Once he let Matt Bradley get a centering pass through and then he didn't really pick up Tomas Fleischmann in time. Gonchar was a little sloppy too, allowing Nicklas Backstrom to get the pass over to Fleischmann. The top units needs to tighten up.
- The Pensblog "jobbed" us for part of Frank's recap...Here's what they said, if you haven't seen (click for better resolution if you need to be):
- I'm gonna step up for Frank a little here...As the Pensblog pointed out, Malkin got caught up ice for the Caps first goal. Malkin did have an assist, but he wasn't a very visible player most of the time he was out there. I wouldn't have been so harsh to say he didn't show up, but Malkin definitely has to be better for the Penguins to win. Getting some support, any support from his linemates in Petr Sykora or Ruslan Fedotenko would go a long way.
Adjustments for Game 2:
--Figure out something on the power-play to convert
--Stay out of the box whenever possible....This isn't the Philly series anymore. Being as Pittsburgh only took one foul (and the automatic delay of game), so far so good on that front.
--Keep the shot total up on Varlamov. Make the rookie make the saves...He did yesterday, but he's been known as a
--Keep Ovechkin's chances to the outside where he is less effective.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Heh, I don’t mind the jobbing. It’s justified in my mind. My comment was purely led by frustration of a loss rather than rational thought. Although I was a bit displeased by him registering only two shots, if I could retype the line I’d probably say something like, “It’s Malkin’s turn to bring it next game” and leave it at that.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
Lol, what exactly is “jobbing”? I think Geno played a pretty good game overall, but he definitely did not take over the game. Sometimes Geno just flat-out wins games for us, and I’d like to see him shift into takeover mode for the next game.
go pens!
It’s their way of calling someone out for something they say or do.
He was quiet in a game where Sid and AO were spotlighted. He’ll step it up in G2. I’m sure of it.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
It’s their word for just about anything, really. “We were jobbing around the South Side on Saturday,” for example. Typically, they use it for either calling someone out, or they use it for making fun of someone.
My personal view is that it’s better to be jobbed by them than nothing to be said at all, because ignoring you is the worst insult they ever use.
Pittsburgh Black And Gold -- So new, it still smells like paint!
Sometimes the Pensblog’s bark is worse than their bite, but I don’t think they meant any ill will by it (just stating their opinions on how they felt malkin performed). I think Malkin played pretty well. He worked his butt off for the second goal. I agree 100% with the statement about Malkin’s linemates. If anyone needs to step it up its those two.
by pretty boy floyd on May 3, 2009 10:16 PM EDT reply actions
I think Malkin got better as the game went on, He did make one ridiculous diagnal cross ice pass in the 3rd and did get an assist in the game. The first goal he got caught too deep in the offensive zone and then when the turnover happened he back-checked like it was the all star game. He was also on the ice for the caps game winner, -1 is not a good game. Yes overall he might have not been too bad, but this is Malkin, the best player in the world on some nights, and the pens don’t have the depth offensively for him to take a night off. Its true that he should be getting more help from his wingers.You watch he’ll be skating like a bat out of hell next game, and we need him to.
Phili B
1) Malkin didn’t look himself in game 1. In fact other than Crosby most of the pens underperformed, yet were still right there to possibly steal game 1.
2) The defense seemed to get the way to stop #8 is to never give him any room. Step up on him and force him to make a move. The caps as a whole hate to dump and chase. Force them to play a gamne along the boards and you neurtralize their top 2 lines.
3) Totally agree that Varlamov is still largely untested despite ‘the save’ on #87. We’d tell them to shoot from everywhere and force him to make saves. He appear to be cool under pressure, but he’s still a 21 untested rookie with 10 or so NHL games
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
I wouldn’t say Varlamov was untested…..the pens outshot the capitals by a lot that game and Varlamov saw plenty of pucks. However he did break a bit. He let a soft goal by Eaton slip right by, and I think it was because we have been pressuring him on offense. I think the only problem is that once we get a shot on net they would take it out of their zone. Once a shot happens we need to stay in and keep shooting. He’ll let up after about 3 or four consecutive shots on goal….he’s good but he’s not the brick wall they all keep saying he is. I also agree we need to be moving more offensively not only on the power play but also in the cap’s zone in general. Yeah we should have a person or two in place for a one timer but the boys on the inside should be trying to cross people up and make a play available. I say that’s how we end up winning game 2.
by Hockey'syoungergun on May 4, 2009 11:36 AM EDT reply actions

























