Petr Sykora not coming back to Penguins, or sending Dan Bylsma a Christmas card
Tomas over at Lets Go Pens has been occasionally translating interviews for years, long before blogs were in the public eye. He just got one from Petr Sykora that is a real doozy. It's not exactly breaking news that Sykora won't be returning to Pittsburgh but Sykie's comments about head coach Dan Bylsma were pretty raw. It's not surprising that Sykora wouldn't be happy with Bylsma who chose to bench the sniper for most the playoffs. But Sykora made his feelings clear:
As a standard caveat you have the remember this is a portion of a translated interview, so even though the spirit of the message is there, it might not have been 100% as it seems.
Q: Could you continue in Pittsburgh?
A: No. My agent talked to the management, and I won’t be back. When the coach does not want Sykora, nothing can be done.
Q: Could you say what happened between you and coach Bylsma was got you to be scratched?
A: It’s never a good thing when you are coached by a former teammate. On top of that, he used to be a player who drifted around as a fourth-liner. I was younger than him, played on the top line, scored goals, was the little star. Now the roles got reversed, and from the first moment I had a feeling that he let me ‘eat it.’ I honestly say that I have not had liked him even as a teammate. Which does not happen to me often…
Q: Do you regret that there is no way back?
A: Incredibly. I think I had two excellent years there, scored 59 goals [ed. note: that's if you include playoffs, which adds up to 184 games], and persuaded the previous coach Therrien about my qualities. But this is business, nobody cares about feelings. I’m pissed off; but on the other hand, it gives me more fuel to prove they had made a mistake.
Sykora may have scored all those goals but in 22 regular season games under Dan Bylsma, Sykora only scored 4 goals and had 2 assists and was a +/- of -1, despite playing on a surging team and on scoring champion Evgeni Malkin's line. Even though Sykora missed time with a shoulder injury, that's not a way to earn a coach's trust.
Seems like a lot of their heat might be drawing back from the Anaheim days. I'm not sure I buy Sykora's contention that Bylsma was punishing him out of jealously for ice time six years ago...Bylsma was pulling strings to get the team to win, and it obviously worked in the purest sense of the word.
Petr Sykora had a good run in Pittsburgh, highlighted with a Stanley Cup. Shame it comes to an end bitterly. It'll be interesting to see if he catches on with an NHL team. You know he'll be fired up to score a goal or two that night.
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
Oh, yeah, that’s clear enough! I’d like to think Bylsma’s more of a professional than that—maybe Sykora was just a bit jealous that Bylsma got the coaching job. I can see where that would be unpleasant for both of them. I do hope Sykora finds friendlier ice elsewhere.
It’s also interesting because he’s probably the first player to have expressed nostalgia for Therrien. :-)
"Don't fear idiocy. It's the new smartness!"--Coke Zero commercial
by GreenEyedLilo on Jul 16, 2009 10:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sad
This is a sad ending to his career in Pittsburgh, but I don’t believe for one second that Bylsma had it in for Sykora because he was feeling all petty and jealous about their time in Anaheim. Bylsma had a chance to win the Stanley Cup in his first year as an NHL coach. He would not have benched someone for personal reasons with the cup on the line.
by Cari on Jul 16, 2009 10:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You ever see a co-worker get promoted to your supervisor? It’s not fun even if you like them. If you hate them, it can make work so miserable your food loses its taste and you stop seeing color, even if both of you are trying to be professional. It does clearly look like one of them had to go. Judging by the results—interesting stats Hooks posted there—well, don’t let the door hit ya where nature split ya, Petr!
"Don't fear idiocy. It's the new smartness!"--Coke Zero commercial
by GreenEyedLilo on Jul 16, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point! I’m sure it didn’t bring a smile to Sykora’s face when Bylsma was promoted. However, there’s also something called professionalism. Satan was relegated to the AHL, but busted his butt once he was given a shot to get back in the lineup when Sykora was benched. Suddenly, mild-mannered Satan embraced his role on the 4th line, and put together a string of solid games.
Given Sykora’s age and experience, personal differences shouldn’t have gotten in the way of his play. After all, Petr was in a contract year, and probably lost a few dollars by not showing up the second half of the season.
"Oh, buy Sam a drink and get his dog one too!" - Mike Lange
by gorgalor on Jul 17, 2009 4:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but this is different
It’s not like Syko was up for the same coaching job.
Plain and simple, Sykora was not deserving of a spot in the lineup while he was benched. He was the definition of a floater in the latter part of this year. He can whine about it all he wants, he owes his current reputation mainly to Malkin, anyone care much for him in his Edmonton days? Probably not.
by AronV on Jul 17, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t say it was smart or sensible. If the translation is accurate, Sykora has let his animosity eat him up so badly that he’s hurt himself in the long run, while Bylsma isn’t hurt one bit. This is the very definition of “bridge burning.” But people don’t stop being human—and sometimes stupid, petty, envious, etc.—just because they play a game for a very comfortable living.
"Don't fear idiocy. It's the new smartness!"--Coke Zero commercial
by GreenEyedLilo on Jul 17, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh...
As much as I like Sykora, it’s not as though you could necessarily pick good spots to use him, if you were Bylsma, on account of how often Petr Gun was injured, or banged up. To poke at some kind of a ‘former player’ grudge kind of thing is pretty egocentric, something I’ve not really gotten out of Petr in anything I’ve seen from him. Whether it’s right or wrong, I wouldn’t know, but, as a coach, you want to put out the best team that you can. Last year a 38% Sykora wasn’t as good as a 38 year old Bill Guerin, nor as consistent as a 32 year old Craig Adams. Got to know what you have on the ice, and it was a toss up for Petr last year through injuries.
Hope him well where ever he lands, but I’m not expecting an injury free season for the guy. Still, he and Geno were a great 1-2 punch. Annoying things can crumble like that.
PensBurgh penalty - Lavender - 2 Minutes for Excessive Stanley Cup Raising.
by Lavender on Jul 16, 2009 10:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s never a good thing when you are coached by a former teammate. On top of that, he used to be a player who drifted around as a fourth-liner. I was younger than him, played on the top line, scored goals, was the little star. Now the roles got reversed, and from the first moment I had a feeling that he let me ‘eat it.’ I honestly say that I have not had liked him even as a teammate. Which does not happen to me often…
That really stood out to me. It seemed many people figured Sykora wouldn’t return but he definitely went out in a blaze of glory. I don’t blame the guy, especially if he felt he was wrongfully treated, but he wasn’t exactly a healthy consideration for most of Bylsma’s reign.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
by FrankD on Jul 16, 2009 11:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh, you know how you leave a job for whatever reason and you have a natural instinct to prove that it was an external reason why you and your former employer are parting ways? It’s never feels like your fault. It always feels like it was their fault. They don’t have the money to pay you, their rules were too oppressive, personality differences, overbearing bosses, etc.? I can’t imagine it being any different in the professional sports world. It also has to be an odd feeling achieving the pinnacle of your profession, but not really being a part of it after being relegated to the sidelines.
"Oh, buy Sam a drink and get his dog one too!" - Mike Lange
by gorgalor on Jul 17, 2009 4:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point. And I can also relate to that desire to play within the Conference/Division, or in my case a rival company, to prove them wrong for what they did. I’m a vengeful bastard.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
by FrankD on Jul 17, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes we all need a little fire put under us to reach our potential. When Recchi left the Pens last year, he went from sure retiree to key part of Boston’s team this year.
"Oh, buy Sam a drink and get his dog one too!" - Mike Lange
by gorgalor on Jul 19, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting note from wikipedia
Apparently Sykora was the last person to swear on analog tv.
If he has a grudge with Bylsma over benching in the playoffs during a slump, imagine how he would feel in Satan’s shoes: sent to the minors just as he was getting hot
by Hansmoleman on Jul 16, 2009 11:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sounds to me
like sykora expected it to be a reunion between old teammates. so sorry sykora but in every pens fan’s book danny carries many more pages then yourself. its sad that he couldnt put his ego aside to play within the system.
" Lord Stanley, etch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jul 17, 2009 1:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m voting to give Sykora a break on this one. First, Sykora is probably kicking himself the hardest inside for laying another egg in the playoffs for the second straight year. It might come off as a cheap excuse to blame his relationship with Bylsma, but the amount of frustration Sykora is battling must be massive. It’s bound to come out in less than flattering ways.
"Oh, buy Sam a drink and get his dog one too!" - Mike Lange
by gorgalor on Jul 17, 2009 4:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Try being a professional...
Sykora should just shut up, take his day with the cup, and move on. This is the big leagues you crybaby, Bylsma was trying to win the cup, maybe if you would actually have scored more goals, you could have dressed with the rest of the team. The only person he should be “pissed” at, is himself for lollygagging through the season. How do we say it? Buh Bye, have a nice day.
by Piratefan13 on Jul 17, 2009 8:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wow
Way to be professional Sykora thought he was better than that.
Maybe Sykora is a bit jealous because Byslma has a better career at coaching and once Sykora hangs the skates up he will be done for good, which I may had he should do very soon.
The end of the year Sykora looked slow and unable to keep the up-tempo game Byslma demanded, I guess when you cant handle it you get demoted.
CITY OF CHAMPYINZ
by YINZER on Jul 17, 2009 8:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Before reading this I certainly had more respect for Sykora than I do now. However, like mentioned by many people above we don’t know what he is going through and how he is feeling. As the famous quote goes (and I can’t remember the exact wording, but let’s just be happy with the general thought) “Don’t judge someone until you have walked a mile in their shoes”.
I wish Sykora the best with another team.
by xaryss on Jul 17, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe he thinks he has a better shot at a Cup with another team
While my instinct is to give Syko the benefit of the doubt, and to wonder whether this maybe doesn’t come across in translation quite the way he intended, it’s hard to look at this and see it as anything other than sour grapes from a guy who’s wearing a 2009 Stanley Cup ring. Which itself is just hard to believe. I look at it this way:
1. It doesn’t shock me that Sykora and Bylsma have some animosity going back to Anaheim. From what I’ve heard, Sykora was not well-liked in that locker room. And referring to Bylsma as “a fourth liner who drifted around” – while he was “a little star” – might help explain that. For the record, the little star scored a grand total of four goals in Anaheim’s 2003 playoff run.
2. Insofar as EVERY OTHER PLAYER on the Pens responded very well to Bylsma almost immediately after he was brought in, Sykora seems to stick out as the problem child. Given all we know about how tightly knit the Pittsburgh locker room was towards the end of the year, I have a hard time believing that could have occurred if Bylsma were allowing personal jealousy or vendetta to guide his coaching decisions.
3. Injury isn’t really an excuse for not showing up in the stretch or in the playoffs. Everyone is nursing something by that point in the year, and I doubt I need to remind anyone that Gonchar basically played the last 2 rounds of the playoffs on one leg. The contrast to Miro Satan is a good one; Satan was a former star who played his way to the minors for the stretch run, but he worked his tail off and earned his spot in the lineup. Sykora didn’t do that.
4. My guess is that Sykora will play next season in Russia rather than the NHL. Oh well. Happy trails, Petr. We’ll always remember game 5 in the 2008 Finals, OK?
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jul 17, 2009 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe he thinks he has a better shot at a Cup with another team
While my instinct is to give Syko the benefit of the doubt, and to wonder whether this maybe doesn’t come across in translation quite the way he intended, it’s hard to look at this and see it as anything other than sour grapes from a guy who’s wearing a 2009 Stanley Cup ring. Which itself is just hard to believe. I look at it this way:
1. It doesn’t shock me that Sykora and Bylsma have some animosity going back to Anaheim. From what I’ve heard, Sykora was not well-liked in that locker room. And referring to Bylsma as “a fourth liner who drifted around” – while he was “a little star” – might help explain that. For the record, the little star scored a grand total of four goals in Anaheim’s 2003 playoff run.
2. Insofar as EVERY OTHER PLAYER on the Pens responded very well to Bylsma almost immediately after he was brought in, Sykora seems to stick out as the problem child. Given all we know about how tightly knit the Pittsburgh locker room was towards the end of the year, I have a hard time believing that could have occurred if Bylsma were allowing personal jealousy or vendetta to guide his coaching decisions.
3. Injury isn’t really an excuse for not showing up in the stretch or in the playoffs. Everyone is nursing something by that point in the year, and I doubt I need to remind anyone that Gonchar basically played the last 2 rounds of the playoffs on one leg. The contrast to Miro Satan is a good one; Satan was a former star who played his way to the minors for the stretch run, but he worked his tail off and earned his spot in the lineup. Sykora didn’t do that.
4. My guess is that Sykora will play next season in Russia rather than the NHL. Oh well. Happy trails, Petr. We’ll always remember game 5 in the 2008 Finals, OK?
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jul 17, 2009 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
tabloid
this is appears to be a bs tabloid. AHA magazine is a joke….I would not believe a word they say.
by CraigC on Jul 17, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope that is the case. Otherwise to me he sounds like the NHL’s version of Terrell Owens
by CGNC on Jul 17, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Sykora. His OT goal in G5 marathon at Detroit kept the Pens alive in 2008. I don’t get is the personal stuff. He acknowledges it’s a business and not personal, then feels compelled to take a personal swipe at Bylsma. Guerin played with Bylsma too and seemed to instantly understand his approach. They’re also the same age, which seems even weirder than Sykora’s scenario, only there’s no drama with Guerin. As tempting as it may be, I’ll refrain from making a generic dig at Euro player stereotypes, even if this sounds like it could have been lifted from a certain poodle haired former Pen.
by chicos_pants on Jul 17, 2009 2:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
confused
I was a little taken aback by Sykie’s comments. I sure hope they were taken out of context. Honestly I don’t understand. Dan has been very straightffoward w/the media-to a point. Considering Sykie’s slump it was reasonable for him to be benched and Bylsma said “we still have confidence in him… to score that big goal” and then in game 6 when the pens were in need of that big goal—or a big block, DB was true to his word. Sykie never seemed to be a malcontent and everyone including DB was praising Sykie to the sky after game 6 for his valiant effort-not vengeful as Sykie portrays it. Maybe it is hyped for the tabloid as ppl are calling it. I don’t blame him for leaving but just b/c of DB doesn’t make sense. We all saw what became of Orpiks dislike for Therrien
by muskid on Jul 17, 2009 4:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Little Sour Grapes
Hopefully there is some embellishment going on here, but sorry to read such comments made in public if PS really feels this way. Oh well, In the choice between the two I have to go with the guy in the suit with a combined 34-11-4 record and a Stanley Cup over a guy who scored a memorable Babe Ruth like goal in the 08 Finals. Sykora did well with the Pens, no way he could be kept due to the Cap and apparently not the right fit anymore for the team.Highly doubt any of that was personal. Good luck Sykora but it`s in Dan I trust.
by Dutch71 on Jul 19, 2009 3:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs




















