Pens fall to Wild 4-3 as powerless play comes up empty on six chances
[SBN Wild Blog - Hockey Wilderness]
Despite outshooting the Wild 38 to 24, the Penguins just couldn't get the best of Niklas Backstrom. Guess his abysmal outing against the Blackhawks Saturday night posed as some sort of wake-up call. Sure, Crosby had a point in every Pittsburgh goal, but Minnesota's Guillaume Latendresse one-upped The Kid with a solid four-point night of his own. And hey, props to former Wild grinder Pascal Dupuis and his three points as well. His second period goal to put the Pens ahead 2-1 was worthy of sniper status.
But perhaps the real story of the game was the PP. Heading into this game the Pens were ranked 29th overall with the man advantage, sliding up only one slot over the past few weeks. The PP went a pathetic 0-for-6, including one of those opportunities with the 5-on-3 advantage that ultimately proved fruitless. Even Minnesota struggled on the PP, one of which included some extra time when Sergei Gonchar nominated himself for an extended stay in the penalty box after an interference call on Cal Clutterbuck. Bad timing no doubt, not only because the Pens were down by one, but more so because by the end of the penalty it would leave the Pens little time to work with in an effort to try and tie it back up.
Was Marc-Andre Fleury off his game, or did bad bounces get the best of him? With all of today's talk focused around a Brent Johnson injury, an accident prone MAF (he clumsily slammed into a door and cut his arm) and a John Curry call up, it seemed to me that Fleury just didn't seem settled at all. Eric Belanger's goal in the first was one of those puck-on-end, bouncing-all-over-the-ice sort of shots that would make it difficult for any goaltender to stop. The puck hit Fleury, but the deflection wasn't enough to send it off the mark.
A Gonchar miscue in the Minnesota end led to a dangerous 3-on-1 led by Martin Havlat. He promptly buried a pass from Latendresse for Minnesota's second goal on the night. Even Clutterbuck's late second period goal was a bit dicey. But hey, no one ever said every goal had to be pretty. The Wild still found a way to get the job done and beat Fleury, flashy plays or not.
As far as what we can take from this game, I think we're seeing something good happening out there with the first line. Guerin and Sid have always had the chemistry, but Dupuis showed tonight that he has the legs to get open and receive a pass. It may not be one of those instances where all he has to do is keep his stick down, but I think after tonight the Pens will continue to work with the Dupuis-Crosby-Guerin combo.
The Pens now head out to the west coast for a date with Calgary Wednesday night. Brace yourself for some late starts if you're on the east coast.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I thought we played a solid game.
But, our PP needs to get moving literally. I think the boys will be shocked at what quicker puck and foot movement will do to their PP percentage. I also think that the second PP needs to get more time. By the 1:15 mark the top PP unit usually looks really gassed.
Overall, I thought out defense was ok tonight. They had some bad break downs though.
The puck was really bouncy tonight…I don’t think you can blame the loss on Fleury. That third goal ended up going to Sid; I checked after the game thinking it was going to Duper, but I guess 87 got it with his foot after Eaton shot it…. and there’s a new name atop of the goal scorers leader board.
871
For some reason, I think patience is the philosophy that Yeo, Bylsma, and Granato employ for the power play – both in execution and positioning. Somehow, they think that it will work. I say they need to work on their puck movement a lot more, and move their feet a lot more. They need to move Geno somewhere. Maybe Gonchar should truly be the only guy up top and Malkin down lower.
What I think it that the coaches think this is kind of positioning problem. It’s not. It’s all about puck movement, lots of shots, and lots of bodies moving around to confuse the PKers which will, in turn, confuse the goalie.
871
The element of surprise can only help them at this point. Another reason I’m baffled at their refusal to switch it up.
Same here. I can pretty much predict what everyone’s gonna do and how they’ll do it on the PP—of course opponents who are paid well to beat the Penguins are going to review video, remember the last game, and figure it out for themselves.
"Darling, you say Brooks Orpik 'checked' that guy. He did not 'get under him and put him into the wall'."--Beloved to me, Winter 2007
Cocktails With the Penguins, where Pens fans toast victories and drown defeats.
by GreenEyedLilo on Jan 12, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions
Calgary? West coast?
Probably news to them :p
Where’s the ocean, eh?
Official BYB Juju Consultant...now accepting rally creature applications!
I think the Penguins are being to patient on the PP. Thats when you need to be aggresive and attack the net . They play catch for 2 mins "being “patient” just waiting for someone to magically get wide open for a tap in goal. Patients is fine to preach for an overall game plan. Over the course of 60 min you need to be patient. When you get 2 full minutes with more players on the ice than the other team though, you should not be patient. Thats when you have to be aggresive. The Pens will not make it out of the first round of the playoffs(cue the "PLAYOFFS!) if they dont improve this powerplay. In the beginning of the year they were winning games despite not scoring on the powerplay, now they aren’t winning those games. It is a serious problem, but the Penguins wont admit that there strategy on the PP is flawed.
if the pens shot the puck as much as they passed on the power play, maybe they would have more scoring chances and get a chance to do something on the power play….obviously if you are wasting 80% of the powerplay passing the puck and/or chasing it back into the defensive zone you aren’t gonna score that much….and I’m pretty sure that most if not all of us are screaming at the TV saying SHOOT SHOOT!!!!
I like Dupuis on the first line a lot more after last night.
Fleury let a couple soft ones in, but I think he acquitted himself pretty well during the Wild’s 5-minute PP. (I kept thinking real hard at the rest of the Pens, “See what they’re doing? They’re shooting the puck at the goal! That’s why they do slightly better than you!”)
I still can’t believe how Gonchar leveled Clutterbuck. Other Pens players were letting their frustration get the better of them, but Gonchar usually doesn’t. I hope the NHL organization sees it that way, too. It was kinda funny, though—I turned my head a few times at the end to make sure a couple of my cats weren’t killing each other, and I could tell when Gonchar had the puck by the booing! He had to be the most hated man in St. Paul last night!
"Darling, you say Brooks Orpik 'checked' that guy. He did not 'get under him and put him into the wall'."--Beloved to me, Winter 2007
Cocktails With the Penguins, where Pens fans toast victories and drown defeats.
I agree. I say keep working with what works. It may not have gotten the win, but Dupuis and Sid each had three points last night. Something is definitely clicking there and I’d hate to see the Pens steer away from it at this point.
Minnesota fans aren’t stupid by any means. You don’t sell out that many home games and no nothing about the sport. But they should know that Gonchar isn’t a dirty player. Never has been and never will be. I know Clutterbuck is a fan favorite, but when you make a living out of hitting everything that moves, you have to assume that one day something like that is going to happen – clean hit or not. With that said, I still laughed at the Gonchar boos and completely understand why they did it.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
if someone had done the same to Gonch
I would have booed the hell out of them. Completely understand why they booed, and Gonch seemed rattled by it. Clutterbuck and the crowd were certainly in his head
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
The defense makes Latendresse look like Cam Neely
Not to try to ignore a good performance by an oponent, but Latendresse only had 9 goals, in his previous 20 games with the wild. Golagasky made him look like a combination of Cam Neely and Bossy. He could never stop him or at least limit his space. I think Golagosky has not regained his pre-injury mobility or skating yet (is he still playing with a brace)? Agree with Frank D about Fleury’s performance. I will not comment again on the PP because I have already posted 2 comments on it (Anemnic PP). Overall the best defensman on the ice was Lovejoy, (although limited ice time) because he followed the principle of keep it simple stupid.
Best Pens player Sid, with another great performance. Why is Adams still in the lineup, I know I asked this before and the answer was defensive purposes, look at his stats, -7 and 0 goals ???
The Penguin power play reminds me of the Merry-Go-Round at Kennywood. They carry the puck as far around the outside as they can then try to shoot through the bobbing horses and immovable booths.
That a Penguin with the puck should move in to evade some horses isn’t even a thought. This power play shooting is reminiscent of the Zubov days.
Looking at just a couple of the PPs from last year’s playoffs, the Pens cycled but went to the net to shoot many times, and were rewarded.
This attitude (real or blogged) that the Pens are just being patient is absurd. Other teams will let the Pens be as patient as they want. Shots from the South Side rarely go in and every team now seems to know it.
In the past years, a favorite chide on the Steelers was they were too predictable. The same could be said for the Pens lately. They don’t seem to be making adjustments between periods. They just aren’t playing the way they played at the beginning of the season. And since the injured returned there’s been a noticeable change in that play. Whether some minds are on the Olympics or not, coaching better get on top of it. I could swear I’m watching an E.J. (Johnson) coached team. There’s a lot of time left in the season and the Pens should be professional enough to step back and correct the problems. Hopefully this isn’t a contagion from the Steelers “hangover.”
At times it seems as though this current group thinks they have the scoring and defensive prowess of the ’91 to ’93 teams. We may never see another club that good given the changes in hockey.
A note on the FSN broadcasters:
I prefer to watch the games on FSN but sadly must listen to those announcers. There is too much of a delay to turn the sound down and listen to Mike. It’s frustrating to watch the action and have to listen to the incessant ramblings about someone’s uncle in Saskatoon catching fish or how much Bob can eat in one sitting. There’s a time for that but not during the action. It seems that the play on the ice has become secondary to personal commentary by these announcers. Equally disgusting is to see a penalty and not hear the announcer tell us what the call was because one or the other was discussing some other subject. For goodness sake, at least pause in your feckless meandering and let us know what the penalty was then you can continue your paid lecture on hockey history while we try to watch the game unless your attention span is so short you forget what you’re talking about if you stop for a moment! To think people at KDKA got rid of Bob Prince for the same reason! And look who they eventually got to replace him!

by 





















