Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Defensive breakdowns by Pittsburgh leads to 6-3 loss to Washington Capitals

Capitals vs Penguins coverage - Japers Rink

More than halfway through the season the two teams that put on probably the best playoff series from 2009 hadn't met.  The teams are rivals, they have arguably, about 7 of the top 15 players in the game between themselves, and they plain don't like one another.  The game was hyped, real hyped.  How much so?  Hockey made the 6 PM SportsCenter 6 minutes into the program, which has to be a record for hockey exposure on that program.

And it didn't disappoint (even if the ending did for Penguins fans).  For 40 minutes the game was incredibly even; back and forth goals by Sidney Crosby and Mike Knuble in the first had things knotted a 1 a piece.  In the second, Eric Fehr gave Washington the lead but Nick Johnson (in his first career NHL game) quickly brought it back to even.  Kris Letang scored to give Pittsburgh a lead but Alex Ovechkin struck before the final intermission.  Things are looking up for a great finish.

But there wasn't one from the black and gold perspective.  Letang pinched in and forced Johnson (again in his first NHL game) to drop back and cover for him.  Alex Semin hit Tomas Fleischman on a great stretch pass and Flash beat Brent Johnson on a breakaway.  The next shift early on a power play, Fleischman played the puck and paid the price when Brooks Orpik took him out.  But Orpik also took himself out of the play, and Nicklas Backstrom had plenty of room to pick his spot short-side for a 5-3 lead.  Empty Net Alex time and we've got a game.

  • Ironic that Pittsburgh had the two defensive breakdowns and not Washington, the team more publically maligned to have them.  But that was the story. 
  • Opportunities were capitialized (gah) too: the Pens were 0 for 4 on the PP (though they did score shortly after one expired) and Washington was 2 for 2.  A defensive stop here, a Sergei Gonchar slapper hits net instead of post there and we've got a different game.  But we don't.
  • Jose Theodore's shaky play almost cost his team; he made two huge gaffes on the debacle of the Crosby goal and "Three-or-more" was leaving rebounds right out in front for two periods.  He tends to run hot and cold and JT60 really buckled down in the 3rd.
  • Brent Johnson can't be victimized too much; goal against right in front where Mark Eaton couldn't control Knuble, goal against when the puck bounces off Orpik at point blank, goal against when Knuble screened Ovechkin's shot, goal against on a breakaway, goal against on a big-time breakdown down-low.
  • Circumstances aside, perhaps that's why Johnny's mainly been a backup.  Goalies have to make the big save and bail his team out.  Especially on breakaways.  You know, like this one.
  • Ruslan Fedotenko was feeling it; three assists tonight, four shots on goal, two hits.  He played very well.
  • Evgeni Malkin also brought it with three assists of his own, several great end-to-end rushes that beat numerous defenders (but not the goalie).  He was definitely skating with a purpose.
  • Only a 33% winning night in the faceoff circle for Sidney Crosby, maybe one of his worst nights of the season in that category.  With six shots on net, three hits, and a blocked shot Crosby was all over the place too.
  • Nick Johnson was in the right place at the right time and has 1 more goal than Chris Bourque ever scored in a Penguin jersey in 19 less games.  Kidding aside, Johnson is showing why he's slowly developing into a legit NHL prospect.  He's almost like a poor man's (right handed) Ryan Malone.  Don't think he's as polished as Malone is these days, maybe more like the 2002-2003 version of Malone.
  • Eric Godard had 1 shift all night long and 1:12 in ice-time.  Given he likely was only in the lineup due to the injuries to Max Talbot and Pascal Dupuis, but hey, at least he had the best seat in the house to what was a pretty good show.

At the end of the day, for all the hype, it's a game worth as much in the standings as a Wednesday night sleeper against a face-less team like Florida or something.  Give the Caps credit, they came out strong and forced the play -- especially in the 3rd period.  They earned the win and deserved it.  Of course, the Penguins only beat the Capitals one time last season (the win coming in shootout, no less) and we all saw how that one ended up.

For all the hoopla, it's just another game.  1 game of 82 in a long season.  And though the Caps and their fans will, deservedly so, feel happy with taking away the win, it's in the rearview mirror now.  For Pittsburgh, two days of rest followed by two games in two days, both on the road, and both against division rivals.  The first one against Philly on NBC Sunday afternoon.  No rest for the weary, but at least there's two days to catch our breath.

Comment 63 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Long time reader, first time poster

Not sure about the effort in the defensive zone this game. It seems like for as much effort the guys put up in the offensive zone, they are missing something while hemmed in defensively. They seem lazy in their movements away from the puck. I counted at least 3 times where a man on the half boards waited for the puck to come around only to be beaten to it by a Washington player. Efforts like that eventually catch up, and tonight it did late

by BWeso on Jan 21, 2010 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

Good first post, and I agree: too sloppy in the zone.

The Caps are an explosive team with enough ability (even without Mike Green tonight) no need to give them presents like I think Letang and Orpik did on scoring plays.

Not just to single those two out, I think Eatonight have had his worst game of the season and some forwards
made ugly, careless passes to get out of the zone.

Pensburgh.com

"I'm glad I got drafted first, because no one remembers number two." -- Alexandre Daigle

by Hooks Orpik on Jan 22, 2010 12:04 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

With the way our D has been getting exposed lately, I’d like to see the forwards make an adjustment and come down a little deeper in their own end for the breakout pass. The caps were reading the Pens breakout, its usually along the right boards. Puck moving defenseman don’t do any good if theyve got no where to move the puck to.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree, wholeheartedly

I believe the team needs to get back and focus on what won them the cup, great systematic play on defense which leads to solid breakouts and the ability to control the play. While I’m very reluctant to say it and it may be somewhat of a stretch, I think there is a slight hangover from last season. The difference with this team is that they have the sheer talent to overcome some of the bad situations they put themselves in. Not time to turn things upside down, just to refocus efforts.

by BWeso on Jan 22, 2010 8:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Yea at this point of the season I don’t think its uncommon to see a lack of “attention to details” as DB puts it or focus. With 7 of the next 11 at home before the Olympic break youd like to see the Pens rolls off a few wins now, because the schedule gets crazy after the break.
I think the Pens have gotten a little to complacent with 4th place.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

If the forward pinches down there and doesnt get the puck it could be an odd man break the other way. I dont think it was a lack of effort, I think it was just a little conservative.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s ok, the Penguins win when it counts!!

by GhostWalker40 on Jan 21, 2010 11:44 PM EST reply actions  

No joke. Caps did better during the regular season series last yr but we all know what happened once they reached the playoffs and took on the Pens.

Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.

by FrankD on Jan 22, 2010 1:50 AM EST up reply actions  

so we’ve got that going for us.

by AronV on Jan 22, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes we do. I would take the Pens over the caps any day when it comes to must win games.

As with the flyers, the caps have proved time and time again that they can’t handle big games

by GhostWalker40 on Jan 22, 2010 2:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Agreed.

Which is hardly why I put so much stock in last night’s win against the Pens. Big game? Sure … not so much from a revenge standpoint but in the sense that it was a good litmus test at this point in the season for the current squad. Much like the Caps victory against the Wings and their loss against San Jose, they were litmus tests to take stock of where they are, where they’re heading and what they need to do. Got the same two points we would get for a victory against Ottawa. Time to move on and there’s still plenty of room for improvement.

Looking forward to the playoffs and more exciting tilts between Caps and Pens.

"Bobby. Can you fly, Bobby?" -Clarence
"Clarence, no!" - Bobby

by Christoph J on Jan 22, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Here come the revenge talks now. I got it from a couple people tonight at work while watching the game. My response: You can have your revenge game, we like our banner hanging up in the rafters better.

God I hate Ovechkin.

A bee in a bird's nest never made no honey, and a bird in a hive sang no song.

by AlexStitch on Jan 22, 2010 12:22 AM EST reply actions  

This isn’t revenge but I can see why Caps fans would think that. Even then I’m pretty sure a majority of peeps over at Japers Rink know this isn’t exactly the “Take that!” response to last year’s Game 7, but it sure is a motivator.

Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.

by FrankD on Jan 22, 2010 1:51 AM EST up reply actions  

no a majority of the people at japers are whining about how the refs were wearing black and gold last night.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, funny how they aren’t complaining of the 2 make up calls the craps got that gave them 2 goals.

by GhostWalker40 on Jan 22, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Majority?

This word, it does not mean what you think it means. People get routinely belittled for advancing the pro-Pens conspiracy theories at Japers’ Rink. It’s easier to paint with broad strokes, but not accurate.

Now let's say you and I go toe to toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor.

by Rob Parker on Jan 22, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you typed in the wrong URL or something. There are always a couple of the conspiracy theorist crowd out there I might add you can find them everywhere, but they are normally shouted down quickly.

As for revenge game thing, sure there was some of that talk, but most people on both side realize what Hooks said in the recap, it was 1 game out of 82 regular season games. Was I happy the Caps won, sure, but I’m not doing cartwheels. All I care about is the Caps doing what the Pens did last season, winning a Cup.

A man gotta have a code

by Carl Putnam on Jan 22, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

may be it’s too strong to say, but I hate Ovechkin too… I acknowledge that he’s currently the game’s outstanding player, but I think the way he plays and shows it makes me hate him even more…

You have to see it for yourself...

by Bla Razor on Jan 22, 2010 6:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought that Malkin

had one of his best games of the season. he was simply everywhere. He could’ve easily had 4 or 5 points, but I think he still finding the balance between when to shoot and when to pass like he had last season. Sid played a good first period, and showed his awareness on that goal because everyone but him and the ref thought that puck was across line. After that, he seemed to fade considerably; skating at half speed, not a lot of hustle.
Our D was bad tonight, but the Caps showed their offensive dominance/awareness on a few goals, like on Backstrom’s goal. I don’t know how many players (who were thinking “pass” behind the net) would’ve been aware enough to see that Johnson had already gone down into butterfly, and that they had about a foot of space to get the puck through…little things like that, except it wasn’t little because that goal put the nail in the coffin for the Pens. You can’t really blame Johnson for the other goals though.

871

by PensFan8725 on Jan 22, 2010 12:43 AM EST reply actions  

Malkin certainly looked his usual dangerous self out there last night … at least the Malkin I’m familiar with. I still recall that incredible power move that he made toward the net in which I was on the edge of my couch. That was definitely his shot to take, but instead he opted for the pass to Crosby who threaded a beautiful one over to Guerin for a quality chance. Good play, but I wondered why Malkin passed up on that chance.

Malkin still seems a little prone to letting others get under his skin a bit. Is he having confidence and physical issues? Just seems somewhat off this year … maybe at 75% from all the “talk” I hear in league news, etc. Better his sluggishness occurs now and that he hits his full stride and peaks come playoff time. What’s your take, Pens Nation?

"Bobby. Can you fly, Bobby?" -Clarence
"Clarence, no!" - Bobby

by Christoph J on Jan 22, 2010 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't blame Johnson too much?

why the hell not? crappy defense or not, 9 goals in the past 2 games in unacceptable.

by BDON911 on Jan 22, 2010 2:49 AM EST reply actions  

agreed

he didn’t do a great job at covering the short side post on 2 of the goals and was kind of frozen on that breakaway goal

You have to see it for yourself...

by Bla Razor on Jan 22, 2010 6:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, those two goals were pretty bad. He seemed a little jumpy tonight, often times he would overreact to a shot. The thing that bothered me the most wasn’t any of the goals, but one of the plays he made in the first period. The Staal line had been stuck on the ice for almost two minutes. When he got a soft wrister, instead of freezing the puck to get a stopage, he pocked it to the middle of his own zone. Thankfully, Matt Cooke was there to pick it up and dump it into the Caps zone.
Sure Johnson wasn’t great, but he can’t be blamed for the loss.

871

by PensFan8725 on Jan 22, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

and his puck handling has looked reminiscent of MAF’s puck play circa 2005 (not good)

by BDON911 on Jan 22, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Johnson when I saw him in DC was one of the best puck-handling goalies around, I thought.

Ovechkin = Green Backs

by red army line on Jan 23, 2010 3:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I usually stick up for the goalies when the defense lets them down, but in big games they have to step up. At what point do we say “he’s just gotta stop that one”. He stopped Ocho after he undressed Letang only to let in a soft rebound goal.

by PensFan024 on Jan 22, 2010 8:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Johnson wasn’t great for sure but, how do you let Backstrom (one of the best players in the league) skate out from behind the goal line untouched.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

how do you not hug the post as he comes from behind the net? johnson played that just as terribly as any of the defensemen

by BDON911 on Jan 22, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Malkin and Fedotenko both played their best games in a long long time last night. I liked Geno having a right handed shot in Johnson on his wing. I’m not going to kill Johnson for standing around and watching a little on the Fleischman goal, I still thought he played a solid game for his first career NHL game. I know Sid scored a goal, but he was invisible last night and I really dont like Kennedy on Sids wing.
Come deadline time the Pens number 1 priority should be a defenseman. Their defense is very small, and other teams are taking advantage of that.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 8:16 AM EST reply actions  

Sid seemed to be flying in the first two periods, then he started jawing with Ocho and lost his focus. He vanished in the third when the team needed him most. Anyone who says the rivalry is fabricated by the media is foolish. Those two clearly have a vendetta against one another, at least on the ice.

by PensFan024 on Jan 22, 2010 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Feds had his best game of the year so far, imo. Nick Johnson was trying hard and didn’t dissapoint, afterall there are very few young forwards who play a good defensive game.

Our first line wasn’t clicking… Guering looked a bit out of place on the LW position… I thought DB will go with a Rupp-Crosby-Guerin combination…

You have to see it for yourself...

by Bla Razor on Jan 22, 2010 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

The Sid- TK-Billy line looked good on paper. It’s a skilled player in Sid, an energy/quick grinder in TK, and a gritty veteran in Guerin. The bottom line is TK plays more of a dump and chase type of game, when Sid plays a “let me pass the puck at the blue line, drive the net so I can take a few opposing players with me, and you either start cycling or shoot.”

871

by PensFan8725 on Jan 22, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Sometimes

I think Guerin has a hard time keep ing up with Sid – when Sid is on he is blazing fast. Agreed that we need a lock down defenseman during the trade – someone who can wear AO like a cheap suit

by CGNC on Jan 22, 2010 11:35 AM EST reply actions  

Didn’t Billy win like the speed skate skills comp a year ago? Or maybe it was more? I thought for his age he could still fly too.

A bee in a bird's nest never made no honey, and a bird in a hive sang no song.

by AlexStitch on Jan 22, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Similar thing I sometimes think with Ovechkin and Knuble.

Guerin looks like he’s still pretty fast to me. Just not Crosby-fast.

Ovechkin = Green Backs

by red army line on Jan 22, 2010 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

that’s probably it

by CGNC on Jan 22, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

yea he did win the speed skating competition in 2001. I dont think he too slow thats just his game. He like to slow things down and make plays that way. Most of the time he makes that work playing with Sid. On other nights it tends to make him look slow. I think it has to do more with the way Sid is playing than Guerin.
“someone who can wear AO like a cheap suit”- not sure someone like that exists.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Guerin was playing left wing and didnt look comfortable. I think we have a problem with the left wing since Kunitz and Dupuis were out.

by nut1976 on Jan 22, 2010 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Defenseman for AO

Sorry for the late reply, I have been out of town, but every team is looking for a lock down defenseman, especially the Capitals if you look at their goals against, and I don’t think there are any in the NHL who wear AO like a cheap suit.

by M 3 on Jan 27, 2010 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Max Matters

Did they bring him back too quickly from his injury?

by CGNC on Jan 22, 2010 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

Not blame the goalie

That’s a bunch of crap, he is an NHL goaltender, he needs to be able to male the big save. That goal where the Cap player came from behind the net was terrible, he left the whole short side open. Ovechkin alone in the PP in between the circles, terrible PK, with a player like that , you don’t necesarily shadow him, but you try to be aware of where he is on the ice. Even if you take a chance on leaving someone els4e open, I rather have that other player take the shot, it’s less likely that he ‘ll score.
Bad ice? did anyone noticed how many players, were falling specially in the corners and near the boards, Letang must have fallen at least 4 times during the game.
I still feel that Adams is a waste of a jersey, don’t tell me he kills penalties, I know that, but he is no Jordan Staal killing penalties, anyone with discipline and sense of positioning can kill penalties. He has not scored since last season, +/- is terrible. Use another center from the Baby Pens, give a guy a chance to grow. Goddard a “necessary” waste of a Jersey.

by Outcast on Jan 22, 2010 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

Mellon arena always has bad ice but, I did notice a lot of people falling down last night. Consol Energy Center here we come!! I feel your pain with Adams & Godard a little bit. Adams is ok for a fourth line guy at times, but when the Pens are really playing well they are rolling all 4 lines. They havent been able to consistently put their 4th line out there a lot.
I’ve finally jumped on the Godard bandwagon. There arent very many enforcers left in the NHL and with Godard averaging 3 mins of ice time and 2 mins of penalties a game it is a waste of a spot. Mike Rupp is close enough to an enforcer. I would rather see a fourth line with guys that could wear down the other team and grind it out. Thats part of what made them a tough team to play against last year, and right now they aren’t a tough enough team to play against.
But I think we are stuck with what we have at this point though.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed with your assessment of the fourth line and I agree we are stuck.

by Ulf Murphy on Jan 22, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Dupuis got 37 stitches is that what Steigy said last night? They sent down Johnson and Jeffery last night. I guess Dupers gonna go on Sunday then.

by genomachine-O on Jan 22, 2010 12:50 PM EST reply actions  

Tough game to watch. Bottom line is the Pens did not have enough to win. On the bright side, it was Malkin’s best game in a long time. I also thought the officiating was poor. I thought they let a lot go on both sides.

I hate to admit it, but I was impressed with the Capitals. They are a much better team this year than last year. They could be very hard to beat if they make a big pick up at the deadline. Hopefully the Pens get heathy and rolling sooner rather than later.

by Tim C on Jan 22, 2010 2:12 PM EST reply actions  

MY main thought while watching the game last night was not which players on each roster were missing from the game, but which player who was no longer on the Pens roster was missing. I kept thinking I wonder how this looks if Scuderi was still a Pen. Thoughts from you Pens fans?

A man gotta have a code

by Carl Putnam on Jan 22, 2010 3:10 PM EST reply actions  

None of us I think were happy with Scuds leaving. We need to pick up a lock down defensive player. Not to mention MAF was not in net

by CGNC on Jan 22, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to mention MAF was not in net

Nor was Varly. Both teams would have preferred different starting goalies. In addition to some healthier bodies like Talbot, Dupuis, Green, and Pothier. I’d say your missing folks beat out the Caps missing by a hair. However, the chances of two teams ever meeting when completely healthy is about 1%. This is where I love the Caps organizational depth right now. They’ve got guys who can fill in and not look silly doing so.

A man gotta have a code

by Carl Putnam on Jan 22, 2010 3:24 PM EST reply actions  

Reply fail.

A man gotta have a code

by Carl Putnam on Jan 22, 2010 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Difference is, Varly tanks under pressure, so comparing MAF with him is, well, funny

by GhostWalker40 on Jan 22, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Weak.

"You're gonna eat that g**d**n Koho, three!"

by fat_daddyo on Jan 22, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

And by weak I mean that

MAF had a 3.76 GAA and an .880 save pct in his first playoffs.

But, yeah, no doubt you’re right. MAF is just as clutch as clutch can be. Always has been.

Varly will undoubtedly never improve for the rest of his career.

I wish I could analyze stuff as smart as you.

"You're gonna eat that g**d**n Koho, three!"

by fat_daddyo on Jan 22, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

MAF almost singlehandedly won Gold for Team USA, so he has that going for him. And I don’t see how a rookie being thrown into the playoffs and basically winning the series for a team after being down 3-1 could be considered tanking under pressure.

Now let's say you and I go toe to toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor.

by Rob Parker on Jan 22, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Arguing with the cap troll isn’t even worth my time.

Go back to your blog, or is it so boring over there, you have to troll ours?

Game 7……………..enough said

by GhostWalker40 on Jan 23, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

You say: Varly tanks under pressure, so he can’t be compared to MAF.

I say: MAF has tanked under pressure in the past.

F&B says: Varly has shown the ability to show up in a pressure situation in the past.

You say: Game 7.

For what it’s worth, the Pens were a better team in that series last year, and deserved to win it. But on the prior point, I’ll enter another series with Varly in net with no reservations.

We’ll see how it all shakes out.

"You're gonna eat that g**d**n Koho, three!"

by fat_daddyo on Jan 23, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Arguing based on fair observations and facts is not worth your time? Ok, fine. Duly noted.

F&B a Cap troll? Hardly. He’s first and foremost a fan of the game just as a good percentage of us that participate in SBN’s partnering hockey blogs are. Given that, you can count on a good amount of worthwhile debates amongst Caps fans as well as worthwhile debates between Caps fans and other fans.

Go back to your blog, or is it so boring over there, you have to troll ours?

I’ll take some good hockey conversation, debate, argument, discourse, etc with anyone regardless of their allegiance over a boring, weak and unsubstantial one … even if they happen to share the same allegiance as I do. Any day. If that entails me going to another blog to see the other side of the coin, than ok. To go and troll anywhere would actually be a waste of my time. Where’s the satisfaction in that?

Game 7……………..enough said

That’s a fair argument, if I can even call it an argument, but I hardly find much substance behind it given that it’s one game out of the relatively few games that Varlamov had played during the 09’ Stanley Cup playoffs. By relative, I speak of the amount of experience MAF has compared to Varlamov. See my argument below on why I hardly think there’s hardly enough compelling examples to say Varly tanks under pressure.

Look forward to more exciting tilts vs the Pens down the road. It’s arguably the best rivalry going on right now in the NHL … As Fat_Daddyo points out, we’ll see how it all shakes out.

"Bobby. Can you fly, Bobby?" -Clarence
"Clarence, no!" - Bobby

by Christoph J on Jan 23, 2010 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Difference is, Varly tanks under pressure

Being thrown into the fire and holding down the fort quite impressively after your team gets behind the eight ball. 2 shutouts and out dueling one of the top netminders in Henrik Lundqvist to lead your team to victory hardly qualifies as tanking under pressure.

This, from a young goaltender who had 6 regular season starts and no NHL playoff experience prior to that series against the Rangers. Not saying this as an excuse for Varly’s performance in decisive game against the Pens last year, but back-to-back 7 game series is certainly a factor that can’t be overlooked — that much playing time can take its toll on 20yr old netminder. And btw … that fire Varly was thrown into doesn’t get any hotter than this.

comparing MAF with him is, well, funny

I think you’re missing CP2Devil’s point. That MAF and Varly are each team’s #1 goaltender is a comparison hard to argue against.

"Bobby. Can you fly, Bobby?" -Clarence
"Clarence, no!" - Bobby

by Christoph J on Jan 22, 2010 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

the thing is. talented goalies might have great starts, but sooner or later inexperiences catches up. remember the horrible days with fleury!. i mean we had some stinky seasons 2005-2007. not to mention 04. Varlamov is an extremely talented goalie, but you dont become a MB in a year!

by nut1976 on Jan 23, 2010 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I have a Caps tint on my glasses, but the feeling I got was Varlamov didn’t collapse under pressure, but wasn’t that sound positionally and had to use reflexes and athleticism to make saves (something I’d noticed in him during the regular season too), and when he got fatigued towards the end of that PIT series, well, it wasn’t pretty.

Ovechkin = Green Backs

by red army line on Jan 23, 2010 3:35 AM EST up reply actions  

the feeling I got was Varlamov didn’t collapse under pressure, but wasn’t that sound positionally and had to use reflexes and athleticism to make saves (something I’d noticed in him during the regular season too), and when he got fatigued towards the end of that PIT series, well, it wasn’t pretty.

This.

And it’s still an ongoing concern. Hopefully, as Varly matures and gains experience, he’ll be more efficient, less reliant on his natural abilities, more positionally sound and trusting of his teammates to get his back. I don’t blame him on the latter point. Mentally he’s been accustomed to bailing out a defensive corp that more often that not hasn’t been disciplined and effective as a unit. Is that a system thing or a personnel thing? Both, with the former being correctable to a certain extent. However it’s painfully evident the Caps blueline corps needs an upgrade from 4-6 of their defensive pairings. As for Varly, that he’s expending way too much energy and the toll it takes on him is painfully evident.

"Bobby. Can you fly, Bobby?" -Clarence
"Clarence, no!" - Bobby

by Christoph J on Jan 23, 2010 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

This. So very true … I’m still somewhat haunted by memories of the Vezina winning one-hit wonder, Jim Carey, that the Caps back in 1994-1997

"Bobby. Can you fly, Bobby?" -Clarence
"Clarence, no!" - Bobby

by Christoph J on Jan 25, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pensburgh.com - a Pittsburgh Penguins blog dedicated to building a community of, by and for Pittsburgh Penguins fans

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who signs, gets traded, or walks?
Image1326398056_small
Ovechkin Still Doesn't Get It
Small
Comparing injuries and games played in the NHL
Mario_saves_small
Game Photos: 1/22/2012 Pens vs Caps
Me_small
Should Crosby Give Up His C?
Mario_saves_small
Game Photos: 1/20/2012 Pens vs Canadiens
Sheroevillaugh_small
An Addendum to "Will it ever end?"
Rothko_1964
My 20 years of being a Penguins fan
Mario_saves_small
Game Photos: 1/11/2012 Pens vs Caps
Photo_8__small
Pens' Problems (other than injuries)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Penguins_cup_08__small FrankD

Me2_small Hooks Orpik

Me_small Stephen Catanese

Editors

Mepiano_small JustinM

Authors

Dan_aeconley_small Lavender

Pens_ring_small GoPens!

Me___small TonyAndrock

Rome_small LauraZ

Moderators

Photo_small tehchico