Goalie Cams: Would They Work?
This post is sponsored by Samsung
I've thought about this and likely brought it up once before in the past, but figured I'd throw it out there to see what others think.
A few weeks ago John from In Lou We Trust proposed the idea of iso cams on players throughout the game. While interesting to say the least, I have a feeling that if networks decide to include this on their actual broadcast it would get extremely boring very quickly.
So, here's another idea.
If you think about it, the average player is only out there for a few seconds at a time. And really, we've all seen the horrific camera angles that NBC tries to work with during the power play (behind the net - blah). So to keep a camera locked on a certain player, even if he is the star of a team, would leave a lot to be desired and would take a lot away from the game. Although I'm not opposed to seeing the iso-cam replay or something.
But one thing I think would be pretty successful is the goalie cam. And I'm not necessarily asking it to take up the entire screen or anything, but instead to pose as an interactive add-on of sorts. Most of us here on Pensburgh sit in a game thread while the game is going on, and there's already been plenty of evidence that suggests a growing number of fans of all kinds of sports do something similar. So why not offer a goalie cam online?
The risk in this is the potential for a tape delay, but this is as much a benefit as it could be perceived as a hindrance.
I don't know about you, but I still like watching the traditional style of a hockey broadcast. But if the goalie cam is, say, 10 seconds behind the game, the opportunity to keep an eye on it while also not missing any of the action is something worth considering. The only downside to a goalie cam is the inevitable boredom that will come in watching a long-distance shot of action down at the other end of the rink. But if this goalie cam allows you to switch between goaltender or maybe even does it automatically for whichever end has the action, I think it'd be a pretty intense feature. Plus, shootouts would benefit greatly from this feature, and we already know just how much the league loves shootouts.
And just in case you were wondering, this has been done before. By that I mean, not to the degree in which I presented my wish list of sorts, but with placing a camera in a goalie's helmet to record all of the action. Here's a post I did up on Marc-Andre Fleury sporting the cam a few years ago which playing for WBS. It's doable.
And in case you haven't seen this by now (I try to unsurface it at least once every year) here is the actual video footage of the camera which, sadly, remains to the tune of Kenny Loggins:
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Goalie cams...
They tried it and it was a failure years ago when they were trying all kinds of nonsense…including the glow puck. What it boils down to is you can’t really see much of anything because goaltenders tend to move too quickly to focus. It may not happen to you, but it will make a lot of people sick, thus losing viewers. Also, when they tried it last time, the goalies moaned that the cameras were too heavy and it will be hard to get something broadcast quality small enough to be comfortable. They use the ref cam in MMA which is a tiny camera attached to the side of their head, but the quality is awful. They went down this road before. Personally, I would rather see the camera behind the net.
by LightningCoach on Nov 12, 2010 8:34 AM EST reply actions
I’d have to agree, a goalie camera is a great idea in theory and offers a great perspective…But it seems like Blair Witch Project on ice in execution and no one wants that.
(Like that circa 1999-2000 reference?)
"Game's the same. Just got more fierce."
by Hooks Orpik on Nov 12, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Big IF...
If they could do it in a decent quality, I think I would tune in online. It would be an interesting view…for a game or two.
by LightningCoach on Nov 12, 2010 8:40 AM EST reply actions
Yeah, it was an interesting perspective but I had to turn it off after about 10 seconds.
.
Follow me on twitter, Picasa or at Pens Through My Lens.
by PensAreYourDaddy on Nov 12, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions
Sure.
This will just give FSN one more way to zoom in on uninvolved players and miss face-offs completely.
by Zuhbeenick Mickhawlick on Nov 12, 2010 10:52 AM EST reply actions
I think it would work
just not in the full time concept…
Put the goalie cam on, and use it as another angle that the TV broadcasts could use from time to time to provide another angle(kind of like the AGH cam[is that the right name for it]) that the pens use for the super slomo shots. I think it could add some value there… I just can’t see it being a full time thing, be it as an online tool or a PIP tool for the TV broadcasts.
I don’t think it’s worth the money to devote 2 cameras for a single stalled angle. A multi-camera set up for a game calls for between 5 to 8 cameras only. To add 2 more only for reasonably brief shots is a waste of logistics space & bandwidth to support.
It’s a nice idea but broadcasters are unlikely to ever use it.
Letestu for Calder!
Staal for Selke
Sid for Everything!
Leave MAF Alone!!!
Just so I never have to answer this again. I'm from Singapore so whenever you see me online, I'm either sleep deprived or just waking up.

by 






















