Chris Kunitz, Evgeni Malkin power Pens past Isles 3-1
Islanders vs Penguins coverage - Lighthouse Hockey
On a night where only an estimated 13,500 souls were able to shake off the snow and make it through the gates of the Mellon Arena, the Pittsburgh Penguins didn't offer the most inspired off efforts, but still managed to shrug off the challenge of the always pesky New York Islanders.
Chris Kunitz, in his second game back from surgery, opened the scoring halfway through the game when he took a nice drop pass from Evgeni Malkin and then drilled a shot by Dwayne Roloson. Before the second was over, Sergei Gonchar drilled a slapper that simultaneously clicked off of Malkin's skate and stick and into the net. There's no doubt it was a good goal and gave the Pens a two-goal lead heading into the last period.
Frans Nielson ended Marc-Andre Fleury's first shutout bid of the season when he got the Islanders only goal about halfway into the third period to make it an intense game. With about five minutes left to go, Kunitz scored his second goal of the game on a breakaway, setup by a nice saucer pass from Bill Guerin.
- The Islanders outshot the Pens 38-28 and out-attempted them 64-50. NYI showed great jump and were willing to throw the puck at the net when they had the chance. Usually a good strategy, but for the most part, Fleury was up to the challenge.
- Attention to detail is a key tenant in Dan Bylsma's system. Jordan Staal gets kicked out of the faceoff circle, and Tyler Kennedy loses the draw to Nielson. Bruno Gervais throws the puck to the front of the net and Kris Letang never picked up Nielson. That's a lapse in judgement by more than one player and the recipe for a quick goal against.
- Aside from that very visible instance, the Pens did great in the faceoff circle; winning 56% of the draws on the night, with Sidney Crosby (61% on 23 draws), Malkin (71% on 7 draws) and Staal (65% on 17 draws) leading the charge.
- TK showed great jump and stood up for himself, dropping the gloves against the little known Matt Martin. It was a losing fight, but the spark that Kennedy's been playing with lately.
- Two of the worst power plays in the league faced off tonight, and wouldn't you know the PK's went a combined 4 for 4. Pittsburgh only had one chance though, if it makes you feel any better.
- Guerin's sauce to Kunitz for the essential finisher was a beautiful play. Billy G is really, really good at throwing those little almost lateral passes out and this was just another example. He might not have the jump or all the finish anymore, but even at 39 Guerin shows some hands on why he's still in the league.
- Mark Eaton has taken some lumps from the fans with his play lately, but let's give him his due: 1 assist, 4 blocked shots in 20:47 played. And he had a plus/minus of +3 when that was the best possible mark you could have in this game.
- Conversely it looks like John Tavares has hit the rookie wall: 0 shots on goal, -2, a penalty taken, and a winner of 43% of his faceoffs. Doesn't look like he's gonna win the Calder Trophy unless he turns it around after the Olympic break.
The Penguins didn't look especially inspired and didn't have a very explosive game (save a few plays from Kunitz and Malkin). But they did enough to play consistently enough to get the win.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Regarding the Nielsen goal: Bob Errey said, in going over the play, that all the defensemen picked up their men, and that it was the center’s assignment to pick up Nielsen. Presumably, since Staal got kicked out and Kennedy took the faceoff, they were unclear as to which of them—the true center or the acting center—should take him. I mention this because, given all the criticism being heaped on the defensemen lately, it seemed only fair to point out a breakdown that was not their fault.
The breakdown is still their fault. Its not like being kicked out of the faceoff is a rare event. I bet they will have a nice chat when in practice and work on that one a few times.
When the forwards screw up in the defensive zone, it’s the fault of the defensemen? By that logic, if Goligoski or Letang fans on a shot on an open net, it’s the forwards who are to blame, right?
Speaking of oft-criticized defensemen, did anyone catch the Caps-Habs game? Hal Gill had an unbelievable game—in the parts I watched, at least, Gill kept turning up with a poke-check or block just at the crucial moment. In any case, he wound up with an assist, 2 shots, 2 hits, 1 takeaway, and 11 blocked shots. Looks like all that practice last spring against the Caps paid off…
I thought there were two men unmarked on that play. The guy who passed and Nielsen. No way two should be so free in front of the net, at any time, and it seems to happen a lot.
I agree: this kind of breakdown shouldn’t happen.
But my point was that not all defensive zone breakdowns are the fault of the D. I watched the goal in question again just now (looking for the 2nd unmarked man). The Islander who assisted on the goal was Bruno Gervais, who was (sort of) covered by Jordan Staal; that is to say, that Staal trailed along behind/beside Gervais as he passed to Nielsen. The reason Nielsen was all alone in front of the net is that, having taken the faceoff, Tyler Kennedy just stood there while the rest of the play continued around him. Kennedy has had to take a number of faceoffs throughout the season when Staal has been ejected; surely he knows what he should do afterward…?
So, yeah, I hope they have a nice chat about about it in practice and figure out what to do in the future in these situations.
The only time I noticed Tavares last night was when he took a whack at Letangs face, not sure what he was thinking there. Decent game from the Pens last night, I thought there D were moving the puck a little better so that was a good sign. Happy to see Kunitz put a few in.
I feel bad for Brooks Orpik, he was so close to getting one last night. Makes me wonder who will get a goal first Orpik or Adams?
Would have loved to see Fleury jump in on Roloson (not really but entertaining). He thought about it, but luckily he didnt injure himself on the snow bucket going back to the net.
Sutton being BOOED and Taveras
Sutton was booed by your fans for the hit last week on Dupuis. If you watched the game, Dupuis turned just before Sutton hit him, leaving himself in a bad position it was not really a bad hit. Your annoucer made a comment when our rookie D Kohn was hit saying that the kid turned making it worse and was close to a penalty. I think it was actually a penalty. They made the comment that it was an inexperince play by a rookie, but really it was the same that Dupuis. except that Sutton is big.
Taveras had had 0 shots but hit 2 posts, unfortunately he has been hitting posts almost every night for the last 10 games or so. It is a common thread on LightHouse Hockey.
I liked one of your guys’ idea to practice with a smaller net. Would probably work and I am suprised that more coaches don’t do it. (but literally only by the crossbar width.)
I agree
i posted that, and that is what I was thinking because we have been ringing th eposts liek crazy during this 9 game fall
by Rickfansince76 on Feb 12, 2010 1:26 AM EST up reply actions
I am a firm believer that everyone should get booed at least once in their life. It happened. He’ll live.
If our announcers were not biased, it would piss me off a little. Un biased commentary should only be for national games and SC games. If you never heard Myron Cope announce a Stillers [intended sic] game, please try to find some audio of his stuff. As biased as it gets, which made him well loved.
Tavares is going to be good. If you think this slump is bad, wait til this time next year. Sophomore slump is worse than the freshman wall.
Faceoffs
While I find it promising that we did well in this area last night, I can’t help but think back to some comments (not made by me) about our need for a defensive center that is very good at faceoffs. Relying on Sid to take every major defensive faceoff is wasting his offensive gifts and using too much of his energy to play defense. Shero needs to bring in a stout defensive centerman to take defensive zone draws to relieve Sid of this responsibility. Adams ain’t cutting it.
Ron Francis was brought in to take these defensive zone faceoffs, and the Pens won the next two cups. Coincidence? Hardly. Mario still took every critical offensive zone faceoff for the Pens because he was the best faceoff man in the game when he wanted to be.
I personally think that we should just give Staalsy some time. It took Sid a bit to get good a faceoffs, and J. Staal is only 21. Give him another year (2 at the most) and I think we will see a drastic increase in his faceoff numbers.
With faceoffs it sort of is an experience thing, where you just learn the tells of the opposing centerman. I’m confident that Jordy can start taking some of the pressure off of Sid by next year at this time.
"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." - George Washington
by Hockey Beard in SLC on Feb 11, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
I think faceoffs have a lot to do with what the linesman allows the center to get away with. If you look at how Sid sets up for a faceoff now, Staal would be immediately kicked out if he did the same. Sid is not square to the marks at all, he sets up already turned in the direction he wants to take it. Over time Staal will start getting away with that too, and that alone with help him become a better faceoff guy.
We do not need another center period. We are way overstocked at center. It would be nice to have another guy thats good at the dot, but the pens won the cup with the faceoff guys they have now. Trading for another center is a ridiculous idea.
by genomachine-O on Feb 11, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
Almost as ridiculous as having the best centerman in the game taking your most important defensive draws? Just because we are overstocked at center doesn’t mean that we are overstocked with good defensive centers, especially when it comes to faceoffs. All teams can be improved and I would rather see Sid take the Pens offensive zone faceoffs and very few defensive zone faceoffs. Play to your players strengths. Sid’s is to score goals or set up goals, not win the @#$#$#!#% Selke.
Pens kicked butt in 3rd on faceoffs
I think at one point we had you 25 to 24, but you guys won like 12 out of the last 14
by Rickfansince76 on Feb 12, 2010 1:27 AM EST up reply actions
Well if Sid wins the faceoff then hes not playing defense. The puck is coming out of the zone and hes either going on the attack or going off for a change. i think the Pens have bigger worries than that.
In the offensive zone
If he loses, he typically charges the end boards and forechecks. If he wins he goes to the net. Total skating say 30 feet max to get into position.
In the defensive zone
If he loses, he plays D and moves to between the circles or mans up. If he wins he skates to the opposing zone. Total skating, at best, is 120 feet to the opposing circles. At worst, goal and it doesn’t matter how far he skates, the shift is wasted.
As said by PensFan024, he only wins 60% of the time. That is a whole lot of wasted motion for the best center in the game when he loses.



















