Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Women's Hockey: US and Canada go for gold

Not much has been said about women's hockey but that doesn't make it any less entertaining.  Fact is, the competition in the women's bracket is somewhat one sided.  Or maybe I should say two sided, given the two strong teams competing.  At any rate, while Team Russia surprised many last night by not advancing to the gold medal game, tonight's USA and Canada women's gold medal game is something that could've been predicted from the first day of the olympics.  These two teams are so good that the thought of just having a best of seven series right out of the gate was an amusing, hypothetical and unfortunately impossible option. 


How good are these teams?  Check it out after the jump.

Star-divide

CANADA

DATE FINAL OPPONENT
2/13 18-3 Slovakia
2/15 10-1 Switzerland
2/17 13-1 Sweden
2/22 5-0 Finland

 

USA

DATE FINAL OPPONENT
2/14 12-1 China
2/16
13-0
Russia
2/18 16-0 Finland
2/22 9-1 Sweden


That's 46 goals for Canada, 50 for team USA, all over the span of four games.  Clearly the competition has been overmatched.

This is the gold medal game USA and Canada have been waiting for in the women's ice hockey competition.  Sweden and Finland will duke it out for bronze, but the better game is no doubt going down tonight at 6:30.  Check it out if you can.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It’d be great for USA Hockey if we take the WJC U-20’s (check), and the Mens and Womens Olympics from the Canadians….Especially since all three are contested in Canada.

…And, you know, 2 out of 3 wouldn’t be too bad either

Pensburgh.com

Wayne Gretzky had it wrong: 100% of the shots Gary Roberts doesn't take DO go in.

by Hooks Orpik on Feb 25, 2010 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

nice adjustment.

Pensburgh.com

Wayne Gretzky had it wrong: 100% of the shots Gary Roberts doesn't take DO go in.

by Hooks Orpik on Feb 25, 2010 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking the same earlier this week. Imagine sweeping them in 4 of 4? The country would be on suicide watch for an entire year.

Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.

by FrankD on Feb 25, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

They crushed us in Curling, so we would just be evening things up.

by PensAreYourDaddy on Feb 25, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

That’s why Team USA let themselves get shut out—kindness, pure and simple. They didn’t want to induce mass suicide among our neighbors to the north. :-)

"Darling, you say Brooks Orpik 'checked' that guy. He did not 'get under him and put him into the wall'."--Beloved to me, Winter 2007

Cocktails With the Penguins, where Pens fans toast victories and drown defeats.

by GreenEyedLilo on Feb 25, 2010 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

These are worse scores than the Women’s World Cup (Soccer). I remember two little factoids from an earlier round game I watched (US/China). One of the women’s games (I can’t remember which countries) recently featured a score of 82-0 with a shot differential of 120+ to 0. The other was that there wer something like 200 women in ALL OF CHINA registered as league hockey players. Why is this in the Olympics? They could have had US/Canada best of three and left everyone else at home.

by Ulf Murphy on Feb 25, 2010 4:11 PM EST reply actions  

You look at basketball and the US running a train on everyone in 1992. Gotta start somewhere. A lot of those teams are really competitive now.

You’re right to say everyone knew it would come down to Canada/US, no one else is in their class for the ladies, but to grow the game it has so start somewhere.

Pensburgh.com

Wayne Gretzky had it wrong: 100% of the shots Gary Roberts doesn't take DO go in.

by Hooks Orpik on Feb 25, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

You look at basketball and the US running a train on everyone in 1992

you are comparing apples to oranges. basketball had been an Olympic event for many years before that. The USA petitioned to have pros allowed so we could start winning the gold again because the world “non-professionals” kept beating our true amatuers. USA sour grapes at losing at the sport we created.

I agree it has to start somewhere, but just because it exists does not mean it should be automatically made into an Olympic event. Men’s synchronized swimming anyone?

by Ulf Murphy on Feb 25, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, I really enjoyed it (and bought a T-shirt, too). And my friend has a talented young daughter who dreams of playing for Team USA herself. Did you watch Team Finland’s joy in receiving their bronze medals just now? It was wonderful—those women made me smile along with them. I think they deserve the chance to improve over 4 or 8 years and contend for gold. I think young girls all over the world who just recently learned that they can play this game and do something cool with it when they grow up deserve that chance. Sorry, but I don’t think the answer here is to take away an opportunity.

"Darling, you say Brooks Orpik 'checked' that guy. He did not 'get under him and put him into the wall'."--Beloved to me, Winter 2007

Cocktails With the Penguins, where Pens fans toast victories and drown defeats.

by GreenEyedLilo on Feb 25, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Well put.

I think young girls all over the world who just recently learned that they can play this game and do something cool with it when they grow up deserve that chance

As the father of two young daughters, I agree, but make the sport an Olympic event when the world can compete, not just show up. Apologies if I sound callous or sexist in any of this. That was not my intention.

by Ulf Murphy on Feb 25, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm checking the game out now

I’ve seen some of the earlier games, but this is so much more watchable when there are two quality teams out on the ice.

As an aside, I’m glad that I haven’t been at these games (men or women) in person. I’d have killed someone by now with the constant DAY-O, WOO-WOO they play over the public address system.

by PensAreYourDaddy on Feb 25, 2010 6:46 PM EST reply actions  

It was awesome! You’re right, the fact that it was far more evenly matched than other games made it more exciting. I wish the game had ended differently, of course, but it was a pleasure to watch.

I also found the way they use the PA system pretty annoying.

"Darling, you say Brooks Orpik 'checked' that guy. He did not 'get under him and put him into the wall'."--Beloved to me, Winter 2007

Cocktails With the Penguins, where Pens fans toast victories and drown defeats.

by GreenEyedLilo on Feb 25, 2010 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pensburgh.com - a Pittsburgh Penguins blog dedicated to building a community of, by and for Pittsburgh Penguins fans

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who signs, gets traded, or walks?
Image1326398056_small
Ovechkin Still Doesn't Get It
Small
Comparing injuries and games played in the NHL
Mario_saves_small
Game Photos: 1/22/2012 Pens vs Caps
Me_small
Should Crosby Give Up His C?
Mario_saves_small
Game Photos: 1/20/2012 Pens vs Canadiens
Sheroevillaugh_small
An Addendum to "Will it ever end?"
Rothko_1964
My 20 years of being a Penguins fan
Mario_saves_small
Game Photos: 1/11/2012 Pens vs Caps
Photo_8__small
Pens' Problems (other than injuries)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Penguins_cup_08__small FrankD

Me2_small Hooks Orpik

Me_small Stephen Catanese

Editors

Mepiano_small JustinM

Authors

Dan_aeconley_small Lavender

Pens_ring_small GoPens!

Me___small TonyAndrock

Rome_small LauraZ

Moderators

Photo_small tehchico