Chicago reporters speculate Pens to trade Jay McKee
From Tim Sassone of the Daily Herald:
Are the Blackhawks stepping up their efforts to acquire a defenseman for the stretch run?
There were plenty of rumors Monday pointing in that direction.
There were eyebrows raised in Pittsburgh on Monday night when defenseman Jay McKee was a healthy scratch against Buffalo. Could McKee be headed to the Hawks?
The 32-year-old McKee is a 6-foot-3, 210-pound physical, stay-at-home defenseman who interested the Hawks last summer before he signed as a free agent with the Penguins for only $800,000 after being bought out by St. Louis.
Sounds like wishful thinking, eh? Behind the jump let's look at the 4 key reasons why Chicago won't be getting Jay McKee for the 2009-10 season.
#1 - Why would the Penguins trade McKee to a possible opponent?
--It's putting the cart waaaaay too in front of the horse to suggest a possible Pittsburgh/Chicago SCF matchup, but it's possible. Both teams are contenders, and in the hunt for the Stanley Cup. McKee is a valuable player, it doesn't make sense for Pittsburgh to deal him in the first place, let alone trade him to a team that could be standing in the way to repeat as Stanley Cup champions.
#2 - The Penguins knew what they were getting into when the signed McKee.
--McKee's situation was unique this summer: he didn't need to put an emphasis on money, but rather repairing his reputation and restoring his status after being bought out by the St. Louis Blues. Since the Blues have to pay him $1.33 million this season and next, he could afford to go to a solid team, and he chose Pittsburgh.
The Pens, for their part, knew going in they're getting a player at a value rate, but when his profile rose, he'd likely walk. Also, does one think that Pittsburgh signed McKee to play for them from October to January? Quite the opposite is true, they'll need McKee for February to the end of the season.
#3 - If anything the players are looking to add another defensive defenseman, not trade one away.
--Does anyone really think the Penguins would go into the playoffs with Ben Lovejoy or Martin Skoula as the #6 defenseman? No way.
Of course, moving McKee might be a part of more deals to come, but Pittsburgh is right against the salary cap. They can't afford to bring in another defenseman for near the $800,000 that McKee makes. Trading away McKee just doesn't make sense for Pittsburgh, there's no way they can trade him and hope to have a defensive corps good enough to make a deep Cup run.
#4 - Sassone says McKee was a healthy scratch on Monday....The Penguins website says he was injured.
--The key to this whole wishful thinking exercise was that the Pens made McKee a healthy scratch Monday....The only problem, he's reported to be injured (see under "Intruiging Notables"). Is that short notice, giving little information and a little cryptic? Yes.
Is that totally in line with bout 85% of the Penguins injury history? Yes.
So dream on Chicago scribes, but you'd be better suited setting your sights on other defensemen....Because all signs point to the Penguins not dealing Jay McKee.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Sassone says McKee was a healthy scratch on Monday….The Penguins website says he was injured.
Still, I have to ask, but was he there? Sounds like just as much speculation as anyone could muster up in that sense. You’re right that the Pens have been known to keep things on the d-low in terms of injuries and whatnot, labeling a potential injury as a “healthy scratch,” but I don’t think this would warrant any sort of thought if not for the pending trade deadline and some other moves going on around the league right now.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
still
it makes zero sense to trade Jay McKee for the Penguins. It would be a fantastic move for the Blackhawks, who are also up against the cap. He’s clearly a great asset for the Penguins this year, but we’re not in the Toronto situation where we could absorb a big contract to help them out. There will be many more Jay McKee’s in our future on one year deals due to our “strength down the middle” baseball strategy that Shero is seemingly implementing.
I am starting to wonder how this marketplace is going to shake out for all of these UFA’s. We already know that the cap is supposed to stay the same or go down a little next season. How are these guys going to get their raises? How can any GM in their right mind pay more than $9mm to any player for one season (16-18% of cap)? I think, as i said yesterday, we are going to see a whole lot of speculation and nothing getting done. Everyone acts as if this is pre-lockout (ie cap-free) hockey, where guys can come and go as they please and the cap means nothing. As much smarter people than me said above and below, McKee is going nowhere. To equal his value in return we will go over the cap. To trade him for lesser value is not what Ray Shero does.
Besides, all the trades that have happened thus far have been for equal $‘s, or close, toward the cap. Many GM’s are going to want to hold guys with expiring contracts for the desperate teams near the deadline. read: for too much. I just don’t see us doing much as our guns (Sid, Geno, Staal, MAF, Orpik, Gonch) are not going anywhere. The remaining parts are not easily interchangable considering the return on value is either too low (McKee, gogo, letang) or our current value gets us a lesser player (Feds, adams, dupuis, TK, et al.). Throw in the cap and it is truly a mess. We don’t really have the guys that are underachievers that could do better with a change of scenery (Jokkinen/Phaneuf, etc)
I’ve been saying no-way to this for days. I don’t know who thinks the Pens would even consider this, but they are takin crazy pills. There is absolutely no upside to this at all. The cap space left by trading him wouldn’t even fit whomever they would trade for. The only way you trade McKee is for a gem of a $3-4M player, and that just wouldn’t fit in McKee’s 800k spot. Period.
I know all the trade talk has been about wingers, but I think the real area the Pens need to shore up is the D. Scoring goals doesn’t seem to be an issue (as long as Crosby/Malkin stay healthy). I’d rather see them use some trade bait to get another solid D in the back. After all preventing a goal is as important as scoring them.
BRENT
The rumor got some legs yesterday when Ladd missed practice for CHI. But that would make no sense at all from the Penguins standpoint. Stupid rumor and I’m sure there are plenty more to come, its only the beginning of February.
its only the beginning of February.
Which is both cool and disheartening. I guess a lot of teams are working the rumor mill a bit more this season given the Olympic break and all. Guess it’ll be really fun to watch.
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
Interesting Idea
I think it would be disastrous to trade McKee, but we do need help on the Defensive front. Here’s something interesting though.
The Isles have put Witt on waivers.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=516081
His plus/minus is horrible, but he’s been injured I guess too. I don’t know too much about his current season, but I know he’s a tough defender, and physical.
A bee in a bird's nest never made no honey, and a bird in a hive sang no song.
More Offense
I see where this is going now….McKee gone, Orpik next…get a few more wingers and a center and maybe another “nice” blueline pickup like Eaton, who doesn’t have a defensive bone in his body and go All Offense..wow, doesn’t that just thrill you Penguin fans?…I can tell you, it sends a ripping, nerve ending chill down my spine…….Get some guys on the blueline that can actually play defense, cause without defense my friends, we go no where in the playoffs.


























