Cooke-ing up a shutout: Pens beat Bruins 3-0
Penguins vs Bruins coverage - Penguins vs Bruins boxscore - Penguins vs Bruins boxscore
Boston fans wanted blood. Riled by the media to avenge the injured Marc Savard, many suggested an out and out sideshow of violence, fights, blood and targeting the Pittsburgh Penguins' skill players. But on a night where the Boston Bruins honored their 1970 Stanley Cup team, the modern day Bruins team played like they were actually 70. The B's registered just 17 shots on goal (at one point shots in the 2nd period were 12-0 Pittsburgh) and pretty much laid down and died.
As expected, Matt Cooke was challenged to a fight as soon as he stepped on the ice. And, to Cooke's credit, he immediately accepted the dance invitation with Shawn Thornton. Thornton's a much bigger player and he's got 19 fights on the season. Cooke can be called a lot of things, but at least he dropped 'em with the right guy in the right way.
Tyler Kennedy scored the games first goal 8:34 into it. He took a pass from Ruslan Fedotenko and the two went up ice on a 2-on-1. TK shot and scored for his first goal in 19 games. This really seemed to take the air out of Boston's balloon. The Bruins have a league low 174 goal (rate of just 2.49 per game) and even a one-goal deficit seemed insurmountable to them. It wasn't of course, that's just how their body language and general effort level looked through the television.
Zdeno Chara, the B's captain, seemed to try and turn the tide and keep his boys (and the crowd) in the game by dropping the mits about halfway through the second with Mike Rupp. It was a spirited bout, but it didn't have the intended result of bringing the Bruins out of their slumber.
Just before the second period ended the Penguins worked a power play and just as it expired Kris Letang took a point shot that Alexei Ponikarovsky re-directed. Going into the room down 2-0 really seemed to floor Boston that much more.
Rupp delivered the dagger when he rushed the puck on his off-wing and sniped a nice shot by Tuukka Rask. The game was decided and the seconds ticked off the clock for Marc-Andre Fleury (and the entire Penguins team) to get their first shutout in the 71st game of the season.
- Most thought Boston might "goon it up" in the dying minutes of the game, but they didn't. Should we give them props for not trying anything cheap or bush league? Yeah, sure. But they showed very little emotion almost all night long, somewhat surprisingly.
- Given that performance, I don't think Boston is going to make the playoffs this season -- with out without Marc Savard. Write that down as an official prediction on 3/18. They looked like they barely cared out there. Not just about playing physical or exacting revenge but also in trying to score goals.
- The Penguins power play, minus injured Evgeni Malkin, looked pretty sharp. They had some excellent puck movement, nice positioning and took 9 shots on the evening. A good performance, well as good of a performance from them that didn't result in actually scoring.
- And the reason the PP didn't convert (though UPT's goal basically qualifies) was mainly Rask. He played really well and kept his team close for a long time. He'd probably want the Rupp goal back, but by that point the game was pretty much out of hand anyways.
- All three goals off the stick of wingers. As mention, TK hadn't scored since the 6th grade picnic and for Rupp it was just his second goal in 26 games. Getting goals that the big guns don't have a hand is a great thing.
- Cooke was quiet after his early fight but he took a pretty foolish tripping call in the first when he flew-by Dennis Seidenberg and with the defender's back turned Cooke took out his legs. Not wise.
- Congrats to Fleury and the Pens defense for keeping it tight and shutting down all Boston's attacks. Sure it wasn't a juggernaut, but a shutout is a shutout.
- Tonight the Penguins did a lot better getting pucks deep, always going forward, making smart passes and good decisions. That's about the polar opposite than the first half of last night's game when an opportunistic New Jersey team took seemingly every bad choice the Pens made and got breakaways.
Now the circus is over. No more Matt Cooke in Boston for quite a while (unless they somehow make the playoffs). The Pens don't get too much time to recover, a day game at home against Carolina awaits. Wait, what? That's right the road-trip is over, and at 2-2-1 there was some moderate success, two disappointing and potentially costly regulation losses in jersey and the uncertainy of Evgeni Malkin's foot/leg. But also a shutout and some good performances along the way.
0 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
To be honest, I feel bad for Boston. They lost a good player in a hit that never should have happened, Cooke didn’t even get a fine, and then their team just fell apart during the big “revenge” game. It must be depressing for the fans.
I’m thrilled that we won, and that Flower got his shutout, but I don’t feel like “haha suck it losers” — they are having a tough time, in part because we injured one of their players.
However, I would like to say “suck it losers” to members of the Boston media who were calling for the Bruins to injure Sidney Crosby. Suck it suck it suck it.
It's ok to
feel bad for them, but the B’s can’t sit there and sulk. It looks like they’ve been feeling sorry for themselves since that hit and it showed tonight. Even without Savard, this team is very talented and should be able to make the playoffs.
871
by PensFan8725 on Mar 18, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Great Job Hooks!
Another great summation of a Penguins game and I bet you were actually looking forward to typing it up since it was a great game, a “W” and 2 points for the Penguins. Great recap and great stats/facts.
by WBSPensFan297187 on Mar 19, 2010 12:11 AM EDT reply actions
Boston DID attempt some cheap stuff
I saw TWO runs — one at Crosby and one at Dupuis
Looked like both were targeting knees
The one at Dupuis was pretty blatant knee-on-knee
by PensAreYourDaddy on Mar 19, 2010 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Fight was disappointing to me
Thornton wanted for both players to take off their helmets because Cooke wears a visor. Cooke didn’t do it. Shocking, I know. Once Thornton did get Cooke’s helmet and visor off and landed a few blows, Cooke went down very quickly. Normally I hate it when guys keep beating on someone when they go down, but Cooke deserved much more of a beating than he received. Much much more.
Jibbles is an older man so you can trust what he says.
I have to agree, I did notice that Thornton made a motion towards his helmet (as if ask if they were both going to take it off) and Cooke didn’t take his off. Obviously, Cooke had the advantage with his visor on and Thornton’s visor-less helmet.
At least Cooke addressed the situation right away. Besides, Thornton is known for fighting and Cooke is a lot less of a fighter and more of a pest.
871
Thornton is 6’2", 220 lbs. Cooke is 5’11, 200 lbs. Thornton has 19 fighting majors this year, good for 8th in the league. Cooke? About a quarter of that. Cooke answered the bell even though he gave up 20 lbs, 3 inches, and a bunch of fighting prowess. The fact that Cooke decided to dance with Thornton is enough. Visor on, or not.
"Oh, buy Sam a drink and get his dog one too!" - Mike Lange
Cooke went down because Thornton was shaking him around and pounding him. Cooke didn’t take a fall. Not that I wouldn’t put it past him, but this time he didn’t.
He could have been a little more of a standup guy by removing the visor, but hey, Thornton’s the one challenging him to a fight. If you want the helmet off so bad, come inside and take it off yourself (which Thornton did).
Wayne Gretzky had it wrong: 100% of the shots Gary Roberts doesn't take DO go in.
Props to Mike Rupp. There arent to many players in the league that can make him look small. Chara did though and Rupp held his own. Scored a big goal too. Not to many fourth liners in the league can have the impact Rupp can have on a game when hes playing well.
I think the thing everyone likes about Rupp is that he’s a guy who really only needs to do a Godard impression and he’d earn his paycheck. Its even better when he plays a smart physical game, goes hard every night, and on top of that has the ability to score some good goals. Not much more you can ask for from a 4th liner.
When a team’s offensive star goes down, the rest of the team, if they have trouble scoring goals, usually ramps up their defense to compensate. It has happened with the Pens a number of times the last 20 years.
Boston looked like a confused team, whether to try to play defense or try to score or to try to intimidate. The result was a miss-mash that ended with Boston back on their heels playing in their defensive zone most of the night.
They looked unsure of themselves. Their passing showed that.
Boston may be a good team overall but they’re playing mediocre, middle of the pack and they faced a better team that also isn’t plying up to its potential. Boston should have played better.
Too much hype, too little preparation for the game?
New Jersey .... what?
Anyone else notice a hilarious trend with New Jersey’s sweep of the Pens?
After the last beat down of the Penguins, the Devils went out and lost to the NY Islanders. After this impressive win, they got beat by Toronto …. who is currently in last place in the East.
Hilarious.
But I am still scared of them in the playoffs. More than I am scared of the Caps, who have a cake-walk of a division.
The Caps have pretty much kicked everybody’s ass this year, weak division or not, but I agree that the Devils are more worrisome for the Pens.
Can’t figure New Jersey out. They have dominated Pittsburgh and Washington, but don’t look so good against everybody else.
by PensAreYourDaddy on Mar 19, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
























