Should Despres Stay?
We all know he has been playing well, but should he stay? He's young and shows lots of potential, but has he shown enough? What is you opinions?
Thoughts?
The content expressed in fanposts does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the staff here at Pensburgh.com. FanPosts are opinions expressed by fans of various teams throughout the league but may be more Pittsburgh-centric for obvious reasons.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hell play a while but will go back to WBS once the regulars are back. He can’t be “Letang’d” because he is in the AHL not a junior team. So they can keep him as long as they want. But once Letang, Michalek and Orpik are back then his minutes would plunge or he would be inactive. Much better for him to get top minutes in the AHL then play an occasional game in the NHL. And once all healthy not sure who you would sit to keep playing him (certainly none of the top 4 D and not Engelland, maybe Niskanen ?)
by biedergb on Dec 18, 2011 11:45 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I don’t think he’s ready yet: this experience is good for his development, but in my opinion he still needs work in the defensive zone, and he needs to be quicker at making decisions with the puck. He might be with us full time as early as next season, but the roster is full this year, and our regulars will be back.
As for the give-him-9-games thing, my guess is that they will probably just use him as much as they need him, without worrying too much about that. But if he gets to the “burn a year of rookie status” threshold and then there’s a choice between him and someone else (who’s playing just as well) to call up, it’s entirely possible they’ll skip over him in favour of the other guy.
Jagr? I don't even know 'er.
I don’t think he’s ready yet: this experience is good for his development, but in my opinion he still needs work in the defensive zone, and he needs to be quicker at making decisions with the puck.
A thousand times this. His physicality in the corners in his own zone really isn’t where you’d want it to be, given his size. That’s not necessarily a knock against him, either; how many 20-year-olds are ready to battle it out in the corners at the NHL level? Anyway, another season’s worth of games in AAA will serve him well; just have to get everyone healthy so that we can send him back.
Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.
How many brooks would a Brooks Laich like if a Brooks Laich could like brooks?
too many injuries =
here for an extended time, possibly the rest of the season.
you have a clear Top 4, then Niskanen,** then Engelland.
if ALL 6 are healthy at the same time, Despres goes down.
difficulty is that having ALL of the Top 6 healthy ALL at the same time, isn’t terribly likely.
if any of them are out the lineup at any time he probably stays up.
PS
**I cannot believe I just typed that.
Wow, what an improvement from Nisky.
Even if all 6 are healthy, they would still need a 7th to carry on the roster. However, that should not be Despres, as he needs to play to develop. As long as there is a spot in the top 6, I would like to see him stay up, but if we(finally) get all 6 healthy again, then he should be sent back down to get more playing time. The more interesting scenario would be if 5 of the 6 are healthy and Lovejoy returns. Should Despres be sent down or does he play and Lovejoy fill the 7th position?

by 



















