The Senators got their rebuild off to an excellent start today, dealing Mike Fisher to Nashville in exchange for a first-round pick in 2011 and a conditional pick in 2012. Usually this would be FanShot material, but I wanted to take a quick second to analyze the deal.And this is what I'm getting - Nashville just had to give up a very large asset (the first-rounder) in exchange for a 30-year-old who has never cracked 60 points, and who has only 14 goals this year. Fisher is certainly top-six material on most teams, but he's not that great. Also, he's not a rental, which is good, but he's under contract through 2013 at over $4M per year on the cap, which isn't good. He's a nice add for a team looking for top-six help, but by no means is he an ideal one.
The larger point here, in my opinion, is that this probably sets the market for any top-six forwards we might consider going after. Take, for example, Penner. He's two years younger, and under contract until 2012 at virtually the same rate as Fisher. More important, he's a better producer than Fisher - he cracked 30 goals last year, and figures to do so again this year. While that's not a huge difference, it does make Penner more valuable overall than Fisher, it would seem. Does it make sense for us to deal a first-rounder + for Penner right now? I'm not sure, but I'd lean away from that deal, especially if Crosby's absence is as extended as we fear it might be.
The content expressed in fanposts does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the staff here at Pensburgh.com. FanPosts are opinions expressed by fans of various teams throughout the league but may be more Pittsburgh-centric for obvious reasons.