Pens' Kunitz, Lightning's Downie face hearing over hits
Link title says it all. Suspensions probably incoming.
about 1 year ago
JustinM
24 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Well...
It’s no secret that it was coming, a hearing that is. And there’s still little doubt that Kuny will get a suspension. However, there have been hearings before with nothing coming from it.
by LightningCoach on Apr 19, 2011 10:39 AM EDT reply actions
Like the hearing that Torres had the other day.
by StripesForLife on Apr 19, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but we all know that there’s a difference between a hit where a guy doesn’t leave his feet and one where he does—or where he leads with an elbow to the back of the head.
I’m sorry, but Torres didn’t deserve a suspension for a clean hit that warranted, at best, 2 mins. for charging.
DUE TO THE LENGTH OF NHL HOCKEY
SKATE ELECTRIC WILL NOT BE SEEN
Interesting, you thought it was clean?
To get it out there for discussion, I don’t like the focus on when a guy left his feet. I think it misses the point. If a guy explodes upwards toward the head, it’s dirty. It doesn’t matter when the foot left the ice. If you are throwing a clean hit you explode in a more horizontal manner through center mass. Torres lined up an unsuspecting opponent and got all head. That’s not an accident. I don’t really see why he would deserve a benefit of the doubt on that hit, either.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
Anyone have a clip of the Downie hit? I still haven’t seen it.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
Or I could read the post right below this one on the main page…
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
hah there’s always that, but we won’t judge
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com, twitter and now on the official Pensburgh Facebook page
My money’s on two games for Kunitz, due to the deliberate nature of the elbow. Downie, probably one simply for leaving his feet. The fact that Lovejoy and Gagne skated a regular shift afterwards lessens the punishment.
DUE TO THE LENGTH OF NHL HOCKEY
SKATE ELECTRIC WILL NOT BE SEEN
Seabrook returned but is going to miss tonight’s game. We’ve seen too many examples of guys returning to play that game and then missing lots of time with concussions for me to accept that rationale. I do agree, however, that it’ll be a big factor for Campbell.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
I was not pleased to hear Seabrook’s answer when he was asked why he didn’t go for the 15 minute check after that hit. “It’s the playoffs and I wanted to play”. He went off for the mandatory 15 minutes after he played another shift, including another hit. I understand he wants to play, but the league and his team in particular, need to enforce that new rule if they want it to be effective. I hope he is okay. But, we all know that upper body injury can mean a number of things, including head.
Oh, I agree that the ability of a player to finish the game (or most of the rest of the game, in Seabrook’s case) shouldn’t be as much of a factor in determining punishment. However, by analogy, our justice system hands out different punishment for attempted murder and first degree murder, which is based solely upon whether the victim lives or dies. It doesn’t make any particular crime any more or less heinous, just that the result is different.
As far as players returning, then missing games, I think most of that happened before the league instituted the “quiet room” rules, where head injuries are scrutinized a bit more closely during the game in which they happen. If we look at the Crosby example, under current NHL rules, he’d have never come back during the Classic.
DUE TO THE LENGTH OF NHL HOCKEY
SKATE ELECTRIC WILL NOT BE SEEN
I don’t like analogizing sports to criminal law.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
There are just way too many differences. The analogies break down in important places and make the principles inapt. For one, there’s the entire branch of “assumption of the risk.” For two, we aren’t talking about depriving anyone of life or liberty. There isn’t a criminal action in most cases. Civil laws would be more appropriate, but are muddier and less forceful so people always want to bring up attempted murder and crap like that. I know that doc knows what he’s talking about in the legal context, but most people don’t and they just spout off without really having any clue what they’re really saying.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
That's it??
Holy crud I think the Pens will take it!!!
by LightningCoach on Apr 19, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Yup. The lack of any record helped I’m sure. Plus, I bet he admitted stupidity at the outset. That always helps and gives the appearance that a stronger deterrent is not needed because he has already figured out himself what a dumb move it was.
Plus, no doubt the NHL talked to Bob Daniels for a character reference.
Kunitz is a good guy and just a good person in general. I can’t imagine he would do something like this with ill intent.
by LightningCoach on Apr 19, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
The whole Bob Daniles thing was a bit of a joke, obvisouly.
That was Kunitz’s coach from College at Ferris State.
by LightningCoach on Apr 19, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions



















